5 ms·
There's this thing called a joke . . . I believe that's waht Zed is making here.
by houseabsolute 16y ago
There's this thing called a joke . . . I believe that's waht Zed is making here.
- GreenMan 16y agoPerhaps you could point out the funny bit.
- zedshaw 16y agoOh, you have to read that in the voice of The Comic Book Guy. Then it's fucking hilarious. Here try it: "You sthee const const &const char[const ] is the proper way to make a thruly safe reference to a conthst char array conthst pointer conthst." See, prime comedy gold there. Also, 'cause you guys think the internet should be nothing but a massive academic white paper curated by Knuth, so any amount of hyperbole sends you into a literalism hissy fit.
- bitwize 16y agoComic Book Guy doesn't lisp like that; although his virtual twin, Go-Bots Guy from Robot Chicken, does.
- sgift 16y agoHe mocks that you can attach const nearly anywhere in c++ and it seems to do something different. (Note: This is a generalization, an important aspect of many jokes)
- mfukar 16y agoThat explanation was so Sheldon Cooper-y. Kudos.
- houseabsolute 16y agoYou'd have to use C++ to understand.
- timr 16y agoYes, of course. When you agree with the rant, the incorrect parts don't count.
- zedshaw 16y agoYou Sir, win a dollar! I think to make the joke really clear I'd have to add a few more consts and some pointers in there.
- slpsys 16y agoNo, that's just what you'd need to make it compile
- steveklabnik 16y agoYou should head over to Reddit and see how bad that one statement managed to keep up your perma-trolling. It's pretty intense.