4 ms·
For animal rights activists there is no acceptable way to keep an animal. They want to regulate farms until it's economically impossible to produce meat (from l
by spiderfarmer 9y ago
For animal rights activists there is no acceptable way to keep an animal. They want to regulate farms until it's economically impossible to produce meat (from living animals). I get that, but in my view nature is brutal and I have no problem killing an animal for a nice BBQ. Who is closer to nature?
- bostik 9y agoFor as long as there have been humans, they have made every effort possible to get away from nature. (I didn't come up with that joke. Gaiman and Pratchett did.)
- oh_sigh 9y agoYes, because nature isn't your friend and is completely indifferent to your pain, suffering, and existence. It's easy to fetishize and "love" nature while we sit in our climate controlled boxes looking at pictures of the 1% most scenic sites in the world.
- matthewmacleod 9y agoThat’s a “no true Scotsman” argument if ever I’ve heard one!
- krageon 9y agoThis is simply untrue. You can try spending some time having an actual conversation with real animal rights activists, you might find out that they're real nuanced people (just like you, hopefully).
- mverwijs 9y ago> Who is closer to nature? It is not a competition. It is a difference of opinion.