4 ms·
George Orwell disagrees.
by foxhedgehog 9y ago
George Orwell disagrees.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- crummy 9y agoThat's a good point - I think when it comes to stories for adults, using a narrative tool like replacing the humans with animals or setting it in a fantasy or scifi setting can help people appreciate it more honestly. Kind of like how Battlestar Galactica can openly discuss the morality of violence against an occupying force, while if it was set in Iraq viewers would have been much less open minded to examining the concept. Perhaps its adults books which should replace humans with animals?
- foxhedgehog 9y agoSee also: Game of Thrones (nuclear weapons, Iraq occupation, global warming, etc.)
- icebraining 9y agoAs in the example you pointed out, this is a very common trope in SF. Often aliens are used, rather than animals; a recent well known example is District 9. Or my favorite example (in film), They Live.
- pbhjpbhj 9y agoWhere did BG do that? (Not disagreeing, just not remembering/catching the particular reference).
- aaron695 9y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupation_(Battlestar_Galactica) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupation_(Battlestar_Galacti... I disagree with OP RE BSG. It was not about morality in general it was directly referencing our current views on morality, specifically the Iraq war. But do agree subbing in animals/zombies/aliens for humans allows movies to get away with more.
- watwut 9y agoI don't think I agree. Many non fantasy non scifi books go there and adults get them. Irak is politically charged sure, because there is war right now and people support that war. That does not exclude fictional place, whether historical or current. In particular, people who read historical fiction deal with these topics all the time. Stories about German occupation, whether real or made up deal with it. French revolution is all about violence.
- grafporno 9y agoAnimal Farm is not a children's book.