3 ms·
I think the point was that user doesn't care about your stack, but they care about the consequences of the stack you've chosen. It's a subtle but important dist
by mark-r 9y ago
I think the point was that user doesn't care about your stack, but they care about the consequences of the stack you've chosen. It's a subtle but important distinction.
- scott_karana 9y agoOf course. My point was that it's fairly common to write slow/unsuitable applications in spite of a stack's strengths, while stack limitations (or strengths) are generally overstated, depending on trends. Proper engineering and design are required no matter what you choose. No silver bullets ;-)
- kerkeslager 9y agoThere are no silver bullets, but there are wooden bullets that are totally ineffective.