6 ms·
That's the point (even inferable from the title) - he'd take a good programmer who was slow (like you describe) over the bad programmer, who is slow, and writes
by pchristensen 19y ago
That's the point (even inferable from the title) - he'd take a good programmer who was slow (like you describe) over the bad programmer, who is slow, and writes bugs, and takes a long time to fix those bugs, and makes more work for other people. Fast good programmer > slow good programmer > fast bad programmer > slow good programmer.
- jimbokun 19y ago"Fast good programmer > slow good programmer > fast bad programmer > slow good programmer." Got a cycle in your graph :).
- pchristensen 19y agoYikes. Let's try again. "Fast good programmer > slow good programmer > fast bad programmer > slow bad programmer." Looks like that makes me a "fast bad programmer". Not bad for third place.