3 ms·
I wouldn't call them "beautiful". They're OK. "Cute" maybe. In any case, personally I'd rather wait for other people to call my work beautiful. Seems a bit pom
by hungerstrike 9y ago
I wouldn't call them "beautiful". They're OK. "Cute" maybe.
In any case, personally I'd rather wait for other people to call my work beautiful. Seems a bit pompous to self-apply it.
- brango 9y ago"Basic" or "simple" are how I'd describe them...
- ardit33 9y agoeh... beauty is in the eye of the beholder. The author has every right to describe them beautiful if he thinks so. In this case I'd call them really cute.
- dang 9y agoWe usually take that word out of titles since it was sort of a gimmick 5 years ago and has definitely passed its best-before date now.
- amelius 9y agoI think the fastest way to judge an icon set is to look at the "people" icons (or "user" icons). These are the most difficult to get right. Often, and I wish I had a better description, the people icons look like the symbols you see on men's toilets. I'd be interested in icon sets which have better solutions for these people icons.