4 ms·
You're right and I suspect it's because multi-arch isn't a business priority. The support for multi-arch is there and things are slowly moving in that direction
by alexellisuk 9y ago
You're right and I suspect it's because multi-arch isn't a business priority. The support for multi-arch is there and things are slowly moving in that direction. I'm more optimistic now than I was 2 years ago.
- praseodym 9y agoActually Docker EE has multi-arch as a selling point[1] with support for Windows and Linux on x86 and Linux on IBM Z (s390). These three options require different Docker images, so it would make sense for them to figure out a way to indicate image architecture sooner rather than later. 1: https://blog.docker.com/2017/08/docker-enterprise-edition-17-06/ https://blog.docker.com/2017/08/docker-enterprise-edition-17...
- tw04 9y agoYou're assuming they don't want to keep it out as a differentiator.
- alexellisuk 9y agoI don't think there's additional multi-arch support in EE which is not present in CE. When I say support here I mean in terms of there being a complete suite of official multi-arch images. I believe the points in this article are still relevant - https://blog.alexellis.io/5-things-docker-rpi/ https://blog.alexellis.io/5-things-docker-rpi/