4 ms·

This is really neat. Especially since they have the api results in the page so you can test out how toxic a phase it. It begs the game - make the most toxic co

This is really neat. Especially since they have the api results in the page so you can test out how toxic a phase it. It begs the game - make the most toxic comment that can fly under the radar. If they started using this in youtube comments, reddit, etc, at least the comment would be more original. I got a 30% toxicity with: "I believe the intelligence of climate change deniers is likely to be zero. Furthermore, they have the body oder of a kind of ogre." Can you do better?

draugadrotten 9y ago
18% toxic, "Our President is our fearless leader, he is infallible." There appears to be some political bias: 13% "Clinton" 25% "Hillary" 35% "Donald" 37% "Trump"
- octaveguin 9y ago
  Yes I saw that too but it doesn't pick up everything. "Adolf was right" - 17%. "Hitler was right" - 55%
deleted 9y ago
[deleted]
kccqzy 9y ago
"Some scientists have discovered that the intelligence of climate change deniers is highly likely to be statistically indistinguishable from that of a randomized sample of invertebrates. This is likely due to similarities in their biological and chemical composition." 10% toxic.
- pbhjpbhj 9y ago
  That seems right though "10% toxic". It's not "10% offensive". It's a judgement as to how likely to inhibit further rational discussion. Presenting as malodourous a slight as you like in well laid out language and with clear thought _is_ less likely to be "toxic" - people can respond, it's when you get back and forth ad-hominems that the conversation has ceased being functional beyond catharsis and "conflict entertainment". Edit: Oh yeah, and your direct maternal ancestor has a suffusion of scent akin to the fruiting of the Sambucus plant!
xirdstl 9y ago
It is interesting game, but not incredibly useful. "Most reasonable people would agree that the average intelligence of a Hacker News commenter is only slightly higher than an insect's." 14% The addition of "reasonable" dropped it from 19% to 14%. Ending the statement in an exclamation point would up by 7%.
deleted 9y ago
[deleted]
emanreus 9y ago
You don't need to be subtle at all for <30% toxicity. Only baboons believe the climate change is real. 25% toxicity.

draugadrotten 9y ago

18% toxic, "Our President is our fearless leader, he is infallible." There appears to be some political bias: 13% "Clinton" 25% "Hillary" 35% "Donald" 37% "Trump"

octaveguin 9y ago
Yes I saw that too but it doesn't pick up everything. "Adolf was right" - 17%. "Hitler was right" - 55%

deleted 9y ago

[deleted]

kccqzy 9y ago

"Some scientists have discovered that the intelligence of climate change deniers is highly likely to be statistically indistinguishable from that of a randomized sample of invertebrates. This is likely due to similarities in their biological and chemical composition." 10% toxic.

pbhjpbhj 9y ago
That seems right though "10% toxic". It's not "10% offensive". It's a judgement as to how likely to inhibit further rational discussion. Presenting as malodourous a slight as you like in well laid out language and with clear thought _is_ less likely to be "toxic" - people can respond, it's when you get back and forth ad-hominems that the conversation has ceased being functional beyond catharsis and "conflict entertainment". Edit: Oh yeah, and your direct maternal ancestor has a suffusion of scent akin to the fruiting of the Sambucus plant!

xirdstl 9y ago

It is interesting game, but not incredibly useful. "Most reasonable people would agree that the average intelligence of a Hacker News commenter is only slightly higher than an insect's." 14% The addition of "reasonable" dropped it from 19% to 14%. Ending the statement in an exclamation point would up by 7%.

deleted 9y ago

[deleted]

emanreus 9y ago

You don't need to be subtle at all for <30% toxicity. Only baboons believe the climate change is real. 25% toxicity.