Did he make the investors their money back (plus a return) by vastly increasing the price of a drug(s)? That seems to me morally evil and also very suspect. Al

Did he make the investors their money back (plus a return) by vastly increasing the price of a drug(s)? That seems to me morally evil and also very suspect. Although I'm sure the rigidity of the legal system would not allow this kind of inference to be made or pursued legally. It would just seem to me as a legal/pharma layman that basically a bunch of sick people got screwed so that some investors (gamblers imo) could get their money back.