3 ms·
> This is not necessarily true. I believe in the US, fundraising would make you an accessory, just as encouraging someone's criminal action where they have cle
by fweespeech 9y ago
> This is not necessarily true. I believe in the US, fundraising would make you an accessory, just as encouraging someone's criminal action where they have clear intent to commit a crime would be.
And now you understand why they booted Lauren Southern. Money is fungible and she fund raised for an activity that was legally dubious.
- nostrebored 9y agoIt's not legally dubious. Fundraising money with an explicitly legal purpose is legal. The potential for misuse at some future date does not an accessory make
- fweespeech 9y ago> It's not legally dubious. Fundraising money with an explicitly legal purpose is legal. The potential for misuse at some future date does not an accessory make The purpose with patreon being to fund her "journalistic activities" which included the legally dubious action.