5 ms·
The Radeon Pro SSG is where it's at: > "The Radeon™ Pro SSG takes it one step further by having 2TB of solid state graphics memory on board" Just insane. In a
by strictnein 9y ago
The Radeon Pro SSG is where it's at:
> "The Radeon™ Pro SSG takes it one step further by having 2TB of solid state graphics memory on board"
Just insane. In a good way.
https://pro.radeon.com/en-us/radeon-pro-wx-9100-and-radeon-pro-ssg/ https://pro.radeon.com/en-us/radeon-pro-wx-9100-and-radeon-p...
- foxfired 9y agoI am surprised this claim is buried in the article with no highlight whatsoever.
- hughw 9y agoDayum. Now if they would just port Thrust to OpenCL I'd be in business.
- burnte 9y agoIndeed, the non-Pro variant only gets you 512GB of mechanical memory
- neilmovva 9y ago"graphics memory" is probably not the right term here. While the Pro SSG does have 2TB of storage on board, that comes in the form of a NAND flash, PCIe SSD (from Samsung IIRC). While fast, this SSD provides single digit GB/s bandwidth at most, compared to the hundreds of GB/s of bandwidth that the DRAM-based GDDR5 or HBM provide. When we say "graphics memory," we're almost always referring to the latter, and never see more than maybe 32 GB of DRAM based memory on board.
- snuxoll 9y agoMore curious about the latency and how that impacts performance, even with DMA going over the PCIe bus to a NVMe SSD is a longer trek.
- justinclift 9y agoIsn't the "2TB" NVMe SSD (in this case) directly interfaced to the card, so not going over the system PCIe bus?
- snuxoll 9y agoIt is, which is why I'm curious how this improves performance compared to exactly the scenario of hitting NVMe storage over the bus.
- neilmovva 9y agoGPUs are generally not latency optimized anyway - if an app is sensitive to tens of microseconds then it belongs on the CPU, broadly speaking. AMD's advantage here is getting drop-in throughput, by switching the SSD directly to the GPU. Thus, the onboard SSD doesn't waste host PCIe lanes (4 lanes, typically) that are getting hard to come by in regular desktop computing systems.
- hughw 9y agoYeah, that seems like false advertising. I believe that much true HBM/GDDR5 would have to cost tens of thousands of dollars. So I was skeptical. That said: if I could get a card with that much real GDDR5 on it, I'd consider paying whatever it took.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- DigitalJack 9y ago"having 2TB of solid state graphics memory" That made me chuckle. What else would it be? Vacuum tube graphics memory?