3 ms·
There are two problems to this in my mind: people are always scrambling for the rare "experienced" people because too little training happens. The other proble
by georgeecollins 9y ago
There are two problems to this in my mind: people are always scrambling for the rare "experienced" people because too little training happens. The other problem is that the best project work I have seen have come from experienced, cohesive teams. It's true that many experienced teams are not cohesive or even sometimes skilled. But I think continuity helps.
A company wonders why their development team is performing and they decide they don't have hotshots, or need more "hotshots" they can recruit from whatever company they think is a good place they can poach from. Communicating to the team that if you want to grow or be promoted, switch jobs.
So a lot of money is spent and chaos created to get the results that a solid, if not brilliant or terribly experienced team, could accomplish.
- gregjor 9y agoThis has been observed repeatedly, Fred Brooks wrote a whole book about it. Everyone says they've read and agree with "The Mythical Man Month" but when schedules loom the first reaction is always to throw more people at it. An expensive hot-shot added late in the project can grind the gears much worse than a green trainee.