2 ms·
Why not follow the 'natural' scheme of binary? A picture is worth n words: http://i.imgur.com/3XIMXcD.png http://i.imgur.com/3XIMXcD.png (added the 0-9 digit
by vinchuco 9y ago
Why not follow the 'natural' scheme of binary? A picture is worth n words:
http://i.imgur.com/3XIMXcD.png http://i.imgur.com/3XIMXcD.png
(added the 0-9 digits for emotional effect)
I can't seem to put my finger on what makes a scheme more 'readable' than another.
Edit: Reminds me a lot of Chinese, but in this case there's a clear procedure to decode glyphs as a word!
- amelius 9y ago> I can't seem to put my finger on what makes a scheme more 'readable' than another. I think one constraint is that the meaning of glyphs should be translation invariant. But this does not hold for dotsies either (the glyph for "a" could be interpreted as "b" depending on where the baseline is chosen). I wonder how subscripting or superscripting works with this font :)