3 ms·
I like the forced UX of typing something, though "continue" might be glossed over. It would be an interesting study to determine if typing "I know the risk" is
by otp124 9y ago
I like the forced UX of typing something, though "continue" might be glossed over. It would be an interesting study to determine if typing "I know the risk" is a better safety mechanism for users (can be A/B tested for less pass-through events) than "continue".
- amelius 9y agoI'm guessing yes, because users are more likely to abort the installation process.
- askvictor 9y agoTyping something unique (eg the name of the app) might also be useful as it forces some cognitive processing.
- Moru 9y agoOr "I allow LeetHaxorApp to access all my data" But I guess that is a bit too much typing for most people.
- timlyo 9y agoMight be a good thing for apps that try and looking like something else, G00GLE or FACEB00K could be missed, but having to type a zero manually instead of an O would (hopefully) eliminate that.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- askvictor 9y agoNice, though it would probably just cause confusion for a heap of people, and would result in them not installing the app (good) and blaming Google for it (bad for their brand). I would have thought by now it would be pretty easy for algorithms or AI to pick up on these kinds of tricks, whether by a similarity score or an image processing approach.