I'm not arguing that machine learning can't take great photographs, just that there are great photographs (and so, also many not-so-great photographs). I suppo

I'm not arguing that machine learning can't take great photographs, just that there are great photographs (and so, also many not-so-great photographs). I suppose one could get into deep philosophical discussions about if a machine intelligence can make art, if it does so, does it have to be regarded as a higher level of intelligence, or does the art have to be regarded as inferior art, etc. Interesting stuff, but not my point at this time.