11 ms·
Job applicants over 40 filtered out by employers
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- nickthemagicman 9y agoSo what are people supposed to do? lol Just die? Seems harsh.
- mythrwy 9y agoThe answer is obvious. Lower the retirement age to 40!
- petre 9y agoThen they would refuse everyone over 30.
- ThrustVectoring 9y agoLower the retirement age to birth.
- ncr100 9y agoProve it was an illegal action and defend your right to employment: https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/types/age.cfm https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/types/age.cfm "The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) forbids age discrimination against people who are age 40 or older."
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- wyclif 9y agoI appreciate your straight answer, and the call to defend employment rights. However, isn't it quite difficult to prove age discrimination? How successful are these legal actions?
- Harken 9y ago...and if you're filtered out at the resume stage, good luck proving the intent.
- dragonwriter 9y agoIf you can get to discovery, consistent filtering at the resume stage is probably the easiest thing to prove is unambiguous age discrimination.
- dbbk 9y agoWait... it protects against discrimination only if you're over 40? So if you're under 40 you can be discriminated against? Isn't that discrimination itself? Huh?
- Markoff 9y agodon't publish specific dates for your education and don't mention first few jobs which are anyway worthless, immediately you got few years younger alternatively you could put your age data in some link with tracking to figure out if they had look at it
- laughfactory 9y agoYeah this will just drive intelligent folks to strip academics dates from their resumes, and limit things to one page containing only their recent employment history. The article was horrifying because I'll be 40 next year, and am just now really getting rolling in my career. And I certainly don't think of myself as any less than my younger colleagues. Sure, I have more baggage and other priorities (bills, family, hobbies), but I still work hard and deliver a lot of value.
- eatbitseveryday 9y agoHow does one determine the age of an applicant from the resume? It's not recommended to put your birthdate. Years in the workforce?
- Joakal 9y agoAnyone able to translate the PDF? Google Translate a Document gives me 'insecure connection error'.
- fern12 9y agohttp://www.ifau.se/globalassets/pdf/se/2017/wp2017-08-the-effect-of-age-and-gender-on-labor-demand.pdf http://www.ifau.se/globalassets/pdf/se/2017/wp2017-08-the-ef...
- kwhitefoot 9y agotranslate.google.com works for me and gives this URL: https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ifau.se%2Fglobalassets%2Fpdf%2Fse%2F2017%2Fr-2017-08-paverkar-arbetssokandes-alder-och-kon-chansen-att-fa-svar-pa-en-jobbansokan.pdf&edit-text=&act=url https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&pr... but fern12's link to the English version is better.
- nonsince 9y agoIt's not about losing the ability to adapt. Older people are more expensive because they're more experienced. Businesses would rather skimp on quality. I say this as a 22yo.
- lawpoop 9y agoAnother aspect I suspect is that older people have been around the block and have better BS detectors. This makes them less easy to roll over, and also they are more likely to offer a counter-narrative to whatever BS mgmt is pushing down to the workers.
- ncr100 9y agoNot a strict rule, however. Seeking a job based on non-pay qualities is also a thing. For me the environment and industry matter a lot and will drive my pay requirements down, when I'm job-seeking. So, the "sense in discriminating against" people who're older has this and likely many other trivial logical flaws.
- awkwarddaturtle 9y agoThat's not entirely true. Also, "experience" doesn't necessarily mean "quality" - especially when it comes to tech. Older people are also more set in their ways, less versatile, less likely to think outside the box, have far less energy and also have more responsibilities. In a startup I worked at, we didn't hire any developers over 30. The only people over 30 was out CEO and he got hired after our 2nd round of VC funding. We wanted devs who fit our culture and of course people who could be "molded". A 40 year old just wouldn't have fit in with a bunch of 20 year olds and he certainly would have trouble keeping up when we developed into the early morning to meet our deadlines/milestones/go-live dates. But then again, startup culture is very different than established oldschool corporate culture. But starting up a company ( especially in tech ) and trying to survive is geared towards younger people. Also, a 40 year old with with 15 year of VB experience in corporate america is worth nothing to a startup building enterprise software in VC++. I would choose a fresh grad from a top CS school with strong GPA and good work ethic over some 40 year old VB developer.
- 9y ago