4 ms·
Perhaps I'm missing something, but are you saying you trusted that the malware documentation is correct?
by kentt 9y ago
Perhaps I'm missing something, but are you saying you trusted that the malware documentation is correct?
- joefkelley 9y agoYeah this is a bit worrying. But since it was leaked, this actually doesn't seem so bad. What incentive would the CIA have to lie internally?
- TheSpiceIsLife 9y agoOne good reason I can think of is to have something for leakers to leak that isn't based in reality. Or: the CIA leaked it intentionally as smoke-screen. I don't know. Are there organisational silos within intelligence agencies? Layers of access? It's hard to know for sure, but I'm yet to see a human organisation that doesn't have political in-fighting.
- bsamuels 9y agoDidn't really have any other choice. We had tons of users calling in last week panicking over what to do about cherryblossom. Without a sample of the implant or confirmation from the CIA that the documents are legitimate & unaltered, this advisory is pretty much all we can do for those users.