We are far away from hard AI (computer actually can think) some people start to believe we might not be able to reach it. What we currently succeeding is develo

We are far away from hard AI (computer actually can think) some people start to believe we might not be able to reach it. What we currently succeeding is developing soft AI (solving specific problems) the problem is that such AI might do fine when things are clearly labeled, but might not know what to do in unexpected situations. With car stopping might often be correct, but in other situations actually not stopping is best etc. Another thing is that your eyes can last you 100+ years, technology is not that durable and breaks more often, the objectives in cameras get dirty etc. The cameras typically aren't as good as human eye, for example there are reports where Tesla wanted to jam into a truck in front only because its back in the camera couldn't be differentiated from the sky. Yes, relying on cameras only is perfectly fine when you play PS4 game, but when life is on the line you want extra safety checks. Kind of like cars have brakes on every wheel and then also a handbrake. How every car has minimum of 3 stop lights (how often you see that one or more lights are bad in other cars?) Your belief that we have hard AI (and this is kind of indirectly created by companies like Tesla, Google, Amazon, IBM etc) gives you conclusion that just two cameras should be enough in reality we did not made much progress in that area and instead just concentrated on specialized AI that is capable solving specialized problems, that kind of approach absolutely works better with more sensors.