3 ms·
> the moderator was somehow socially aware (such people exist) and felt, or seemed to feel, that the interviewee was anxious, and felt that doing the talking fo
by gamache 9y ago
> the moderator was somehow socially aware (such people exist) and felt, or seemed to feel, that the interviewee was anxious, and felt that doing the talking for her made her more comfortable.
Oh! OK, so not sexism, just paternalism. But only for the female panelist.
- pbhjpbhj 9y agoIt's only paternalism if his motivation is based on the person's sex, surely. How can you tell that motivation? Why not political bias, nepotism (friend-of-a-friend, say), pity, ...?