4 ms·

As others have mentioned, the most exciting thing about Chrome 59 is that it is the first release with headless support. I wrote a guide a while back on running

by foob 9y ago

As others have mentioned, the most exciting thing about Chrome 59 is that it is the first release with headless support. I wrote a guide a while back on running headless Chrome with Selenium that someone might find interesting if they're interested in trying out Chrome in headless mode [1]. It's quite a bit easier now that the stable channel is on version 59 and I just updated the guide to specify which steps are no longer necessary. [1] - https://intoli.com/blog/running-selenium-with-headless-chrome/ https://intoli.com/blog/running-selenium-with-headless-chrom...

dvfjsdhgfv 9y ago
Thanks, I enjoyed reading it (in spite of the pop up!). I think sooner or later someone will use this method to crate a (local, self-hosted) tool to manage FB posts without actually using FB. Finally!
- foob 9y ago
  Thanks for reading it and I'm glad that you liked it! Sorry about the pop up... I'm not a huge fan of them as a user myself, but we only show it on the first post that you read and it drives a lot of sign ups for our monthly article newsletter. We try our best to only put out high quality articles and to keep the intrusiveness of marketing widgets to a minimum.
  - andrei_says_ 9y ago
    Mmaybe consider collecting sign ups in a different way? Now that you know modals are amongst the most hated strategies. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/most-hated-advertising-techniques/ https://www.nngroup.com/articles/most-hated-advertising-tech...
stephen123 9y ago
Hey don't they put that in the release notes. Ps, great post!
- joshschreuder 9y ago
  If you're reading Hacker News, the developer release notes are probably more up your alley (they do mention this) https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2017/05/nic59 https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2017/05/nic59 https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2017/04/devtools-release-notes https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2017/04/devtools-r... I subscribe to the blog via RSS.
deleted 9y ago
[deleted]
mikewhy 9y ago
Lots of people are mentioning headless support, but has it made it to Windows?
- paulirish 9y ago
  Headless in Windows is fully supported in Chrome 60, which is now the Beta. Mac and Linux are in great shape as of 59.
- joshschreuder 9y ago
  I tried it out yesterday, moving our unit tests from PhantomJS to headless. Short answer is it's not fully working yet, the browser still pops up with a blank interface window, but unit tests work as expected. I tried out the PDF and screenshot stuff, but they didn't seem to be working on Windows yet. Remote debugging is fine, but as mentioned, you get the blank interface window, so it's not really headless yet.
arwineap 9y ago
I came across your blog post while implementing this week. Thanks for writing it! Did you have any issues with send_keys? There is a bug I ran into with upstream chromium [1] but there is no mention in your examples [1] - https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromedriver/issues/detail?id=1772 https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromedriver/issues/detail?id=17...
kyledrake 9y ago
Does anyone know if they got the WebGL support for headless working? There were issues last time I checked.
TarpitCarnivore 9y ago
So if I'm reading your site correctly we no longer need to compile Chromedriver in order to use headless? 2.29 will work with the headless option?
- thom_nic 9y ago
  According to [1] Chrome 59 still is not supported. [1] https://chromedriver.storage.googleapis.com/2.29/notes.txt https://chromedriver.storage.googleapis.com/2.29/notes.txt
  - TarpitCarnivore 9y ago
    Ok that's what I was thinking. The OP's blogpost was a little confusing in how it was worded. I think I'll be sticking with Phantom until chromedriver stable is updated.

by foob 9y ago

dvfjsdhgfv 9y ago

Thanks, I enjoyed reading it (in spite of the pop up!). I think sooner or later someone will use this method to crate a (local, self-hosted) tool to manage FB posts without actually using FB. Finally!

foob 9y ago
Thanks for reading it and I'm glad that you liked it! Sorry about the pop up... I'm not a huge fan of them as a user myself, but we only show it on the first post that you read and it drives a lot of sign ups for our monthly article newsletter. We try our best to only put out high quality articles and to keep the intrusiveness of marketing widgets to a minimum.
- andrei_says_ 9y ago
  Mmaybe consider collecting sign ups in a different way? Now that you know modals are amongst the most hated strategies. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/most-hated-advertising-techniques/ https://www.nngroup.com/articles/most-hated-advertising-tech...

stephen123 9y ago

Hey don't they put that in the release notes. Ps, great post!

joshschreuder 9y ago
If you're reading Hacker News, the developer release notes are probably more up your alley (they do mention this) https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2017/05/nic59 https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2017/05/nic59 https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2017/04/devtools-release-notes https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2017/04/devtools-r... I subscribe to the blog via RSS.

deleted 9y ago

[deleted]

mikewhy 9y ago

Lots of people are mentioning headless support, but has it made it to Windows?

paulirish 9y ago
Headless in Windows is fully supported in Chrome 60, which is now the Beta. Mac and Linux are in great shape as of 59.
joshschreuder 9y ago
I tried it out yesterday, moving our unit tests from PhantomJS to headless. Short answer is it's not fully working yet, the browser still pops up with a blank interface window, but unit tests work as expected. I tried out the PDF and screenshot stuff, but they didn't seem to be working on Windows yet. Remote debugging is fine, but as mentioned, you get the blank interface window, so it's not really headless yet.

arwineap 9y ago

I came across your blog post while implementing this week. Thanks for writing it! Did you have any issues with send_keys? There is a bug I ran into with upstream chromium [1] but there is no mention in your examples [1] - https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromedriver/issues/detail?id=1772 https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromedriver/issues/detail?id=17...

kyledrake 9y ago

Does anyone know if they got the WebGL support for headless working? There were issues last time I checked.

TarpitCarnivore 9y ago

So if I'm reading your site correctly we no longer need to compile Chromedriver in order to use headless? 2.29 will work with the headless option?

thom_nic 9y ago
According to [1] Chrome 59 still is not supported. [1] https://chromedriver.storage.googleapis.com/2.29/notes.txt https://chromedriver.storage.googleapis.com/2.29/notes.txt
- TarpitCarnivore 9y ago
  Ok that's what I was thinking. The OP's blogpost was a little confusing in how it was worded. I think I'll be sticking with Phantom until chromedriver stable is updated.