The examples of moral codes I gave were not meant to be used on AIs but by AIs working for/with humans. > The problem with your first statement is you assume t

The examples of moral codes I gave were not meant to be used on AIs but by AIs working for/with humans. > The problem with your first statement is you assume that human morality is the pinnacle of morality and all other forms will be lesser to that standard. To be clear, my first statement was meant to read as: "AIs without human morality, which would put certain restrictions on them, will likely have less power than amoral AIs in the long run." And "power" here means the ability to effect things in the world. I did not assume that human morality is the pinnacle. I agree with you that it is likely not an optimized one. My whole argument rests on the principle that AIs that do not incorporate human morality into its utility calculus will have negative consequences on us.