3 ms·
> Global warming might be a bad deal for Arizona. Global warming might be a bad deal for the globe. > But most big city governments are going to be run by lib
by glitcher 9y ago
> Global warming might be a bad deal for Arizona.
Global warming might be a bad deal for the globe.
> But most big city governments are going to be run by liberal Democrats because...they are big cities. Not that they are wrong, just pointing that out.
You are pointing this out why? Obviously the lead in to "just pointing that out" was circular logic that means nothing, and I feel there is a deeper message you wanted to convey but then it's just so easy to type dot dot dot... instead.
- seanmcdirmid 9y ago> Global warming might be a bad deal for the globe. Canada and Russia might benefit from it in a perverse way, but I otherwise agree. > You are pointing this out why? Obviously the lead in to "just pointing that out" was circular logic that means nothing, and I feel there is a deeper message you wanted to convey but then it's just so easy to type dot dot dot... instead. Most big city executives are not going to like pulling out of the Paris agreement, so you might as well talk about the mayor of Atlanta, Houston, Salt Lake City...they are going to express support for it. So why not mention them all? It doesn't matter if the big city is in a red state or not.
- glitcher 9y agoGood points, thanks for sharing. I have a feeling the OP on this comment thread is probably from Phoenix, and was most likely promoting local action as opposed to what may happen in big cities across the country. But it will be very interesting to see how this plays out over time.