3 ms·

So unprofessional and disrespectful for both people... Forgery is a crime - and I think sending an email from someones unlocked computer would fall under that

So unprofessional and disrespectful for both people... Forgery is a crime - and I think sending an email from someones unlocked computer would fall under that if it was pressed in court. If sysadmins have things set up that way, they can unlock a locked desktop and log in as the user; or even change the users account password and log in. Using these two methods as the example I would think no sane person would think it ok to log in and send an email as described. So why is it OK in this case, when a computer is left unlocked? A normal person should feel guilty digging in another persons stuff - always; and the person who was violated should also be indignant. Period. What if a boss or coworker had requested you to take care of something on their computer? Is the fact they gave you the access make it ok to look through their browser history while your there? If not, what exactly is and is not off limits during an 'authorized' entry event? And what is different if they left it unlocked instead? Hope you can see how this opens a huge pandoras box. Also, if people are not there to protect the team and coworkers, how can they trust each other when it is really important?? What will happen when there is an attacker from the internet forging things? How will you even know who is telling the truth then? A professional will take care of the problem with a warning or a note. After so many repeat offenses, give the warnings more teeth, and/or start tracking them and provide punishments. Alternatively lock the desktops with an inactivity timer. Just realized maybe you are trolling (or hoping you are!).

tomtoise 9y ago
I worked somewhere where the behaviour described in OP's post happened. It was just lighthearted. We worked in desk 'bays', so someone sat next to the unlocked PC would have visuals on what the prankster was doing on the machine. Harmless emails like 'I'm buying the whole office donuts at lunch' were sent. It was very rare for any employee to leave their machines unlocked twice with this unofficial procedure in place.
matwood 9y ago
> So unprofessional and disrespectful for both people... I know of companies that do this, and I totally agree with you. It's done under the guise of security, but is really just immature hazing. First, if I'm in an office environment with fellow employees why is locking my computer so important? Is it to stop the random person from stealing company secrets or impersonating me? If that's the case why wouldn't the other employees around my computer notice someone, since clearly they had to be close enough to notice if I left it unlocked. Second, if I'm out in public theft is much bigger issue than locking the computer. Finally, and something you touched on, is that now it makes it hard to differentiate between authorized and unauthorized. It's much easier to say using someone else's computer without their knowledge is grounds for termination 100% of the time.
- bouncycastle 9y ago
  Exactly - The reason for security is a weak reason - my coworkers had the same access as I and everyone could see my screen or if there was someone unknown sitting there, they would have spotted them straight away. We were all shoulder to shoulder in a far corner of the company. There was not much secret stuff going on there either. There are many more important security practices that should be followed, more important than desktop locking, yet they don't attract the same kind of vigilante attention. In my situation, it was blatant bullying, especially considering the inappropriate content of the email that was sent. The desktop locking was just an excuse. There was no other way you could frame this.
- Smushman 9y ago
  > It's done under the guise of security, but is really just immature hazing. I so agree. I saw things like this in the military. At that time it was tools... Before aircraft takeoff and between shift changes; all tools must be turned in and accounted for. If one is missing all personnel for that shift and the one coming on have to go together for a tool search at every jet, vehicle, etc. This means every person searches as a team until it is found - this could be 50 or more people, 1/2 staying late from the previous shift! Depending on the supervisor they may also ground the aircraft squadron temporarily- ensuring that the pilots and admin staff also know who lost a tool. It was extreme hazing - but at least I could assume that it was done for a good reason - true safety. If a jet starts up and a tool gets sucked into the engine bay people can die - not to mention the damage - it would be career ending for those found at fault. Unfortunately like anything some joker I saw used it as an opportunity to harass someone they did not like. People could pocket a targets tool for a while, and turn it in anonymously at some point into the search when they felt enough damage had been done. When I saw someone do that and justify it as a lesson - I decided that my integrity is more valuable. I have not regretted that particular decision yet.

tomtoise 9y ago

I worked somewhere where the behaviour described in OP's post happened. It was just lighthearted. We worked in desk 'bays', so someone sat next to the unlocked PC would have visuals on what the prankster was doing on the machine. Harmless emails like 'I'm buying the whole office donuts at lunch' were sent. It was very rare for any employee to leave their machines unlocked twice with this unofficial procedure in place.

matwood 9y ago

> So unprofessional and disrespectful for both people... I know of companies that do this, and I totally agree with you. It's done under the guise of security, but is really just immature hazing. First, if I'm in an office environment with fellow employees why is locking my computer so important? Is it to stop the random person from stealing company secrets or impersonating me? If that's the case why wouldn't the other employees around my computer notice someone, since clearly they had to be close enough to notice if I left it unlocked. Second, if I'm out in public theft is much bigger issue than locking the computer. Finally, and something you touched on, is that now it makes it hard to differentiate between authorized and unauthorized. It's much easier to say using someone else's computer without their knowledge is grounds for termination 100% of the time.

bouncycastle 9y ago
Exactly - The reason for security is a weak reason - my coworkers had the same access as I and everyone could see my screen or if there was someone unknown sitting there, they would have spotted them straight away. We were all shoulder to shoulder in a far corner of the company. There was not much secret stuff going on there either. There are many more important security practices that should be followed, more important than desktop locking, yet they don't attract the same kind of vigilante attention. In my situation, it was blatant bullying, especially considering the inappropriate content of the email that was sent. The desktop locking was just an excuse. There was no other way you could frame this.
Smushman 9y ago
> It's done under the guise of security, but is really just immature hazing. I so agree. I saw things like this in the military. At that time it was tools... Before aircraft takeoff and between shift changes; all tools must be turned in and accounted for. If one is missing all personnel for that shift and the one coming on have to go together for a tool search at every jet, vehicle, etc. This means every person searches as a team until it is found - this could be 50 or more people, 1/2 staying late from the previous shift! Depending on the supervisor they may also ground the aircraft squadron temporarily- ensuring that the pilots and admin staff also know who lost a tool. It was extreme hazing - but at least I could assume that it was done for a good reason - true safety. If a jet starts up and a tool gets sucked into the engine bay people can die - not to mention the damage - it would be career ending for those found at fault. Unfortunately like anything some joker I saw used it as an opportunity to harass someone they did not like. People could pocket a targets tool for a while, and turn it in anonymously at some point into the search when they felt enough damage had been done. When I saw someone do that and justify it as a lesson - I decided that my integrity is more valuable. I have not regretted that particular decision yet.