12 ms·
Not only is a plant based diet healthy, and every study that tells otherwise is obviously paid by the livestock industry; it's also the only environmentally sus
by KitDuncan 9y ago
Not only is a plant based diet healthy, and every study that tells otherwise is obviously paid by the livestock industry; it's also the only environmentally sustainable diet. I really don't get how so many highly intelligent people acknowledge those facts and still put their tastebuds over everything else. It's not like vegan food can't be absolutely delicious either.
- ihsw2 9y agoHow do you argue that an environmentally sustainable diet is important to someone that has no concern for environmental sustainability, nor any interest in such things? Also, why do you assume highly intelligent people are predisposed to care about environmental sustainability?
- KitDuncan 9y agoWell obviously if health, ethics and environmental sustainability aren't a concern to you, then I don't expect you to go on a plant based diet. Many otherwise intelligent people do care about the environment though (driving electric cars) and still eat meat and animal products.
- ihsw2 9y agoOne can go on a plant-based diet for health benefits alone with complete disregard for environmental sustainability, and by the same token one can live an ethical life without regard for environmental sustainability. I'm still confused -- why do you assume highly intelligent people are predisposed to caring about environmental sustainability?
- JoeAltmaier 9y agoBecause sustaining the environment is important to all our survival?
- nxc18 9y agoEvidence? I'm all for environmental sustainability, but there are very few people who would have their survival threatened by any environmental changes in their lifetime. For those few on an island somewhere who very well could be threatened in their lifetime, there is no intervention that will prevent that change - the damage is already done. Looking further than that, technology has historically found solutions and we seem to get better at technology every day. Beyond that, climate change is just 'change' - the new may be just as livable as the old, albeit with significant differences in e.g. population distribution. If you think about what sustainability means, being unsustainable isn't all that bad; it just means you'll have to change at some point, either when you have a choice or when you don't. In the absolutely terminal case, where we don't make any effort to be sustainable, we're looking at lifestyle changes and maybe a population contraction - not the survival of the species. Sustainability is nice and good - who likes change, really? - but there is no case to be made for it being an issue of survival.
- KitDuncan 9y agoWell even if it's not for environmental sustainability, just sustainability in general is not given with the current western diet, since it takes a lot more land to farm livestock, than to farm plants. With population and meat consumption rising it will be impossble to sustain your diet. Also however you look at it, you can't agree with deforestation for cattle grazing land. The livestock industry is responsible for the extinction of most animals today. It's a shame we are sacrificing wild live diversity, just because we can't stop eating meat with three meals a day.
- nxc18 9y agoThose are all very good points. Personally I'm a big fan of sustainability and at the very least emphasizing poultry over beef would be a good move, with vegetable alternatives being a longer term aspiration. Even today I've found a lot of e.g. veggie burger type things are better than the beef alternative and more sustainable. I would just prefer to see legitimate, provable, current consequences used to convince people. The "we need it for our very survival" is unconvincing on its own right, and downright harmful when it takes the place of legitimately compelling reasoning. The public (who are the ones that need convincing) have a hard time grasping cause and effect on timescales greater than they lifespan.
- tathougies 9y agoYeah, so I have always eaten both meats and veggies. My blood results still showed a vitamin B12 deficiency. I was already noticing symptoms like anemia, mental fog, lack of energy, etc. I upped my meat intake to mainly grass-fed, fatty beef, and my latest tests show a normal level. You cannot get B12 from plants, period. Meat is necessary for human life. Saying otherwise is dangerous. After seeing my experience, my wife (vegetarian for almost a decade) has started eating meat again. This isn't something worth dying over.
- Blahah 9y agoIt's not true that "you cannot get B12 from plants, period" [1]. You can get trace amounts from various edible land plants, but dietarily significant quantities from some algae. Also fermentation of some plants can provide B12-rich foods. It's fair to say that vegans need to take particular care that they get sufficient B12. 1: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4042564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4042564/
- goraw 9y agoAlso have a look at [1] [1] http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v283/n5749/abs/283781a0.html http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v283/n5749/abs/283781a0...
- KitDuncan 9y agoJust supplement it? B12 isn't meat or animal product specific at all. It's created by bacteria in soil and our species becoming overly hygenic is the reason for us not getting enough B12. The only reason why meat contains it, is because livestock is getting it supplemented as well. I just like to skip the middleman.
- mping 9y agoDo you know there have been millions or billions of healthy vegetarians living on this planet? Maybe some people do need supplements, or even meat, but that doesn't make it "a necessity for human life", proof is in the human lifes that are vegetarians from birth and didn't die from B12 def.
- CuriouslyC 9y agoWhile I agree with you about the ethics of our current methods for raising animals, I disagree that veganism is the answer. First, animals are a necessary part of ecosystems. For example, ruminants control grass growth, and they effectively transform energy in those grasses into a form that ultimately supports an entire food chain. If you eliminate ruminants from grassland, you lose insects, which feed birds and rodents, who feed larger predators, and so on. Controlling grass growth also leads to more plant biodiversity, which tends to further increase animal biodiversity. Second, animals are a great way to "recycle" food waste into delicious meat and fertilizer. Pigs and chickens are perfectly happy consuming things we find completely unpalatable. We use a lot of resources growing food specifically for these animals, while simultaneously throwing out a ridiculous amount of food grown for humans. Pretty silly. Ultimately, animals can be raised in an ethical and environmentally sustainable manner. This might entail a significant increase in the price of meat, but that's alright. The current low price of meat is something of a historical anomaly anyhow. As for health, almost all the blue zone diets include a small amount of meat (about 4oz a day).
- KitDuncan 9y agoMeat consumption is the primary driver in loss of biodiversity: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969715303697 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969715...
- stellar678 9y agoThere really isn't a conflict between the fact that ruminants can provide an important ecological service to grasslands, and the fact that CAFOS/meat factories cause ecosystem devastation. The problem is that our economic system doesn't have a clear way to account for the ecological costs of one approach vs the ecological benefits of the other, so good meat is expensive and bad meat is cheap. Whoops.
- simonsarris 9y ago> and every study that tells otherwise is obviously paid by the livestock industry That is ridiculous. A vegan diet is a diet of deficiencies. Some collected notes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hoG5ATcIqwxzvHktWywBJ7L_6kQosE5NVJNVGDWDaAE/edit?usp=sharing https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hoG5ATcIqwxzvHktWywBJ7L_... Maybe highly intelligent people don't want to erode their brains.
- KitDuncan 9y agoYou know food deficiencies are very common among average americans as well right? Even the B12 defeciency which is the only consistently recorded deficiency among vegans, is VERY common amongst omnivores. I am getting my blood tested regularly and all of my values are absolutely perfect. Sure if you're planning on eating only vegan junk food you're going to encounter deficiencies, but don't tell me it would be any different if you only ate at MC Donalds.
- brokensyntax 9y agoYep... McDonald's is inherently unhealthy... And we have a complete understanding of exactly what every human should eat... Without deviation. One way for everyone. http://www.today.com/health/man-loses-56-pounds-after-eating-only-mcdonalds-six-months-2D79329158 http://www.today.com/health/man-loses-56-pounds-after-eating... Eight major food allergens – milk, egg, peanut, tree nuts, wheat, soy, fish and crustacean shellfish – are responsible for most of the serious food allergy reactions in the United States. Allergy to *sesame is an emerging concern.
- KitDuncan 9y agoDude just because a fat guy starts restricting his calories and goes from an incredibly unhealthy cholesterol value to a slightly less catastrophic cholesterol value doesn't make McDonalds healthy. How anybody can take this serious is beyond me.
- parthdesai 9y agoSo i got to gym regularly and i need ~150 grams of protein a day. Please tell me how will i get this from plant based diet. Oh and i grew up a vegetarian and only vegetarian diet that i can eat regularly is Indian cuisine. Rest of vegetarian diet is just not delicious enough to eat regularly.
- rando444 9y agoI usually get most of my protein for my workout supplemented by protein shakes, but other than that dairy products are very high in protein, also beans, peas, nuts, etc.. and there are a lot of other potential sources if you google around.
- noir_lord 9y agoYep though you missed the gold standard for 'complete' proteins - eggs. The biological value of proteins is measured against egg protein as the benchmark (I'm sure there are few proteins that exceed the egg but they are readily available, easily prepared and cheap as a protein source).
- parthdesai 9y agoWhere i grew up (India), eggs was considered non-vegetarian. Maybe he didn't miss it.
- dragonwriter 9y agoEggs are not plant based.
- parthdesai 9y agoBeans don't help you when you are avoiding carbs. Nuts are insanely high in calories. If you are eating around 1800 calories a day and trying to avoid cards, there aren't many options.
- KitDuncan 9y agoCome on we are on hacker news. I expect you to be able to find protein values of plants by yourself. Plants not containing enough protein is an absolute myth and it's astonishing to me that there are still people believing in it. Go eat lentils, chickpeas, beans, soy products and hemp protein and it should be more than easy to get enough protein. There are world champion UFC fighters and olympia athletes on a vegan diet and I am pretty sure, they don't have any problems getting their protein. Also checkout youtube. There are a lot of vegan bodybuilders sharing their recipes.
- swah 9y agoShould I eat eggs, drink coffee or have a cup of wine this month? Just these days: http://www.bbc.com/news/health-39998678 http://www.bbc.com/news/health-39998678