3 ms·
No, just put aside some money before quitting your day job and you're fine. Again, if you can't manage to fund development of your MVP, then maybe entrepreneurs
by igor_filippov 9y ago
No, just put aside some money before quitting your day job and you're fine. Again, if you can't manage to fund development of your MVP, then maybe entrepreneurship isn't for you. I guess the same applies to the "Venus Project".
- worldsayshi 9y agoIn other words, if you're not rich entrepreneurship is not for you. edit: Sure I realize that you can start with something smaller and fund able by smaller means. But how long until you can fund what you really want to create?
- igor_filippov 9y agoIf you can't make money, entrepreneurship is not for you.
- worldsayshi 9y agoIf you can't make money you can't build a better world?
- rukittenme 9y agoYes. Please rate the better world: World A (has food) or World B (does not have food). Money isn't magic. Its an abstraction. Remove it and possessions become currency. So if your better world does not make "money" (read: food, water, shelter, doctors, raw materials, etc.) then your "better" world will kill all of its inhabitants.
- worldsayshi 9y agoIt's obvious that money is not a sufficient abstraction for resources and/or the usage of money eventually leads to world b. The "money system" is killing whatever resources it's supposed to represent.
- rukittenme 9y ago> It's obvious that money is not a sufficient abstraction for resources and/or the usage of money eventually leads to world b Citation needed... We had "resource based economies" for hundreds of thousands of years. In that time, millions starved to death. Clearly a hidden variable exists... North Koreans starve under a monetary system. Americans waste billions of pounds of food every year under a monetary system. How could money be responsible for both outcomes? Surely there are alternative explanations.