3 ms·
Self driving cars, Ford probably in panic mode
- sharemywin 9y agoBMW: 638 miles driven, 638 miles/disengagement That's weird.
- deepGem 9y agoGood catch. There must be some typo. Doesn't this mean there's a zero error rate. Seems practically impossible, at least with the current tech.
- sharemywin 9y agoUnless it meant they are 2nd in miles driven and stopped "publishing" or driving to not reveal too much.
- kingbirdy 9y agoOr they've only done one test (that they'll share), and it went 638 mi before disengaging?
- leereeves 9y agoOr a single error in 638 miles. Elsewhere in the article "disengagement" is defined as "a human driver has to take over", seemingly excluding natural stops. > But what's even more significant is how much farther Waymo cars can go before a human driver has to take over. For Waymo, one of these so-called disengagements happened, on average, every 5,127 miles.
- blcArmadillo 9y agoWhile their argument probably still stands it seems they should have mentioned Ford's recent investment of $1 billion USD over 5 yrs in the self-driving car startup Argo [1]. I haven't been able to really dig up any details on how far along Argo is though. [1] https://media.ford.com/content/fordmedia/fna/us/en/news/2017/02/10/ford-invests-in-argo-ai-new-artificial-intelligence-company.html https://media.ford.com/content/fordmedia/fna/us/en/news/2017...
- wibbleywobbley 9y agoThe data they are basing these arguments on seems rather suspect. Wouldn't Ford be doing the bulk of it's testing in Michigan? Surely the data Tesla is collecting from it's production cars on the road also counts for something too.
- Isamu 9y agoAnd actually Ford is investing in Argo in Pittsburgh, which is a very new self-driving car startup.