7 ms·
Otherwise Texas policy seems to be pro-corporation. No corporate franchise tax until you make at least $100k, and you can form a corporation to do whatever you
by stcredzero 9y ago
Otherwise Texas policy seems to be pro-corporation. No corporate franchise tax until you make at least $100k, and you can form a corporation to do whatever you want. I know of one Texas corporation that did business for years in a Schrodinger's cat-like state, where it only kind of existed because they were in the process of finding a new board. Technically, the corporation existed, but wouldn't have been a valid entity to do business with, but most people would only check that the company existed. I'm not sure why it was done, but I suspect those guys got out of paying the franchise tax this way. (No, it wasn't my company!)
- arbuge 9y ago>> No corporate franchise tax until you make at least $100k, Actually that limit is $1.11m. https://comptroller.texas.gov/taxes/franchise/ https://comptroller.texas.gov/taxes/franchise/
- tyingq 9y agoNote that it's revenue. You still owe franchise tax even if you're losing money.
- njharman 9y agoWhich is good incentive to make some, money that is.
- tyingq 9y agoIt's also an incentive not to incorporate/operate low margin businesses in Texas.
- adventured 9y agoThey have a clause to lessen that problem "Franchise tax is based on a taxable entity’s margin." https://comptroller.texas.gov/taxes/publications/98-806.php https://comptroller.texas.gov/taxes/publications/98-806.php
- tyingq 9y agoIt's a lie though, it is not, especially if you're a services and not a physical product company that can show "COST OF GOODS SOLD". Their definition of margin is not correct.
- code_duck 9y agoI don't think it's intended to account for all expenses. You do have the option of using compensation to cover your costs, though - why would that not be adequate for cost of providing services?
- tyingq 9y agoThere are many flaws. For example, paying 1099 contractors doesn't count as an expense. That's just one. There are others.
- Pulcinella 9y agoTexan here. The Eastern District of Texas is a federal court and patents are federal law. The court is physically located in Texas but Texas state policy does not influence it.
- cestith 9y agoBut juries are selected locally.
- Pulcinella 9y agoYes but State Law is separate from Federal Law. Texas can't pass a law that says only patent troll-hating Texans can sit on a federal jury, no matter how friendly Texas is to business.
- Jabbles 9y agoLocal people may know that having large corporations fight legal battles in their district benefits the local economy.
- kevin_thibedeau 9y agoThey definitely know because all the free goodies the trolls have gifted them. The whole operation is akin to racketeering.
- anandsuresh 9y agohttps://youtu.be/3bxcc3SM_KA?t=479 https://youtu.be/3bxcc3SM_KA?t=479
- cestith 9y agoState law doesn't matter in a federal court, but the culture of the place the jury is selected and the practice specialties of the local attorneys do. The parent post to yours was talking about Texas broadly, not specifically about Texas state law overriding federal law. That's your assertion, and borders on a straw man. The state, and especially that part of the state within that federal court district, being generally friendly to one type of party or another has to do with more than state laws. It has to do with public perception, legal specializations in that court district, and more. The juries are selected from that public and local attorneys in a district known for patent trolling will likely specialize in patent trolling cases.