4 ms·

John Pilger actually puts "rape investigation" in inverted commas. This is misogynist fuckwittery of the first order. Assange is FREE TO LEAVE THE CUPBOARD HE'

John Pilger actually puts "rape investigation" in inverted commas. This is misogynist fuckwittery of the first order. Assange is FREE TO LEAVE THE CUPBOARD HE'S HIDING IN TO ESCAPE A RAPE CHARGE WHENEVER HE LIKES. This is literally the EXACT opposite meaning of detained. Let's go over this again since Assange fans are largely misogynistic rape-apologist gullible fools. 1. He has been voluntarily hiding in a cupboard for seven years. 2. He's been doing this because he was accused of rape 3. In the U.K. and Sweden we consider rape a serious crime 4. Hiding in a wardrobe does not exempt him from answering to the crimes of which he is accused 5. He skipped bail losing his followers £60,000 in surety 6. Bail skipping is a criminal offence; he is wanted in the U.K. for that 7. If he ever leaves the wardrobe he's hiding in he will be arrested and charged for bail skipping 8. Sweden may reopen the rape investigation until 2020 9. Now the rape charges are droppped it will be easier, not harder, to extradite Assange to the US 10. The US has made no formal extradition request yet, but given Assange's role in collaborating with the kremlin to sabotage the 2016 US presidential election, I wouldn't be surprised if they decided to.

lhnz 9y ago
Responded to you here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14386736 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14386736
adekok 9y ago
This mind-set is depressing. If you're accused, you're guilty. Damn the facts! That's worked out well in the past. /s http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/kill-a-mockingbird-1962-film-867767 http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/kill-a-mockingbird-1... One of my favorite quotes is from "A man for all seasons": William Roper: So, now you give the Devil the benefit of law! Sir Thomas More: Yes! What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil? William Roper: Yes, I'd cut down every law in England to do that! Sir Thomas More: Oh? And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned 'round on you, where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat? This country is planted thick with laws, from coast to coast, Man's laws, not God's! And if you cut them down, and you're just the man to do it, do you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? Yes, I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake! Denying the rule of law to "get" a bad person is called "lynching".
- grabcocque 9y ago
  Well we don't know if he's innocent or guilty, because he skipped bail and fled justice. But he'll always be the man who spent a decade hiding in an attic to avoid a rape charge.
  - harry8 9y ago
    Not charged. Not even accused by victims. The omission of the number of very public death threats he's received as a possible factor is less than balanced at best.
  - harry8 9y ago
    Not charged. Not even accused by victims. The omission of the number of very public death threats he's received as a possible factor is less than balanced at best.
  - adekok 9y ago
    So you're admitting you don't know the facts and evidence, but you are calling him a rapist. Repeatedly. That's a level of cognitive dissonance which is surprising to admit publicly.
    - grabcocque 9y ago
      I'm pointing out, that which is 100% factually correct, that he was accused of rape and fled from justice. This is a matter of public record. He skipped bail, costing his supporters £60K in surety. For skipping bail he's now wanted for failure to appear, which is a criminal offence in the U.K. of which he is most certainly guilty. Whether or not Assange is a rapist we can't ascertain because he fled justice rather than face the accusations. Maybe if he ever leaves the wardrobe he's hiding from justice the case will be re-opened he'll answer the accused and we'll find out if he's a rapist or not. But since there's no statue of limitations on his failure to appear, of which he is certainly guilty, it doesn't look like he's emerging from that attic any time soon.

lhnz 9y ago

Responded to you here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14386736 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14386736

adekok 9y ago

This mind-set is depressing. If you're accused, you're guilty. Damn the facts! That's worked out well in the past. /s http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/kill-a-mockingbird-1962-film-867767 http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/kill-a-mockingbird-1... One of my favorite quotes is from "A man for all seasons": William Roper: So, now you give the Devil the benefit of law! Sir Thomas More: Yes! What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil? William Roper: Yes, I'd cut down every law in England to do that! Sir Thomas More: Oh? And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned 'round on you, where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat? This country is planted thick with laws, from coast to coast, Man's laws, not God's! And if you cut them down, and you're just the man to do it, do you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? Yes, I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake! Denying the rule of law to "get" a bad person is called "lynching".

grabcocque 9y ago
Well we don't know if he's innocent or guilty, because he skipped bail and fled justice. But he'll always be the man who spent a decade hiding in an attic to avoid a rape charge.
- harry8 9y ago
  Not charged. Not even accused by victims. The omission of the number of very public death threats he's received as a possible factor is less than balanced at best.
- harry8 9y ago
  Not charged. Not even accused by victims. The omission of the number of very public death threats he's received as a possible factor is less than balanced at best.
- adekok 9y ago
  So you're admitting you don't know the facts and evidence, but you are calling him a rapist. Repeatedly. That's a level of cognitive dissonance which is surprising to admit publicly.
  - grabcocque 9y ago
    I'm pointing out, that which is 100% factually correct, that he was accused of rape and fled from justice. This is a matter of public record. He skipped bail, costing his supporters £60K in surety. For skipping bail he's now wanted for failure to appear, which is a criminal offence in the U.K. of which he is most certainly guilty. Whether or not Assange is a rapist we can't ascertain because he fled justice rather than face the accusations. Maybe if he ever leaves the wardrobe he's hiding from justice the case will be re-opened he'll answer the accused and we'll find out if he's a rapist or not. But since there's no statue of limitations on his failure to appear, of which he is certainly guilty, it doesn't look like he's emerging from that attic any time soon.