5 ms·

And that an article in MotherJones based on an anonymous comment on another blog is currently #2 on HackerNews is simply dispiriting.

thaumaturgy 16y ago
Yep, especially since BP's presentation to Congress [1] would indicate that that anonymous commenter doesn't have a complete understanding of what's going on. [1]: http://energycommerce.house.gov/documents/20100527/BP.Presentation.pdf http://energycommerce.house.gov/documents/20100527/BP.Presen...
- melvin 16y ago
  Nothing that has occurred since the incident has given me the impression that BP has a complete understanding of what's going on.
  - megablast 16y ago
    Or, more importantly, the willingness to admit that fact, or to admit the truth. Initially they decried all the people who suggested the flow was much larger than their estimates. Then, more and more sources come out suggesting it. And just recently, they have admitted it might be true. This seems to be modus operandi for companies these days. Deny everything, then weeks later come up with your own sources suggesting exactly the same thing, when the issue has died down.
  - billswift 16y ago
    Nothing that has happened in the last 40 years has given me any reason to believe that anybody, or even everybody in aggregate, has a complete understanding of much of anything that is going on.
- joe_the_user 16y ago
  Uh... What is this link supposed to prove? It's a diagram of the failure modes of the BOP and some discussion of how it failed. I can't see any indication it shows the well under the BOP is intact or that the movement of high pressure oil-and-sand isn't chewing the assembly to pieces as BP tries to suck some of the oil out of the well.
davidw 16y ago
Agreed. I've bitched about seeing right (or libertarian)-wing propaganda sites like mises.org here - same thing goes for motherjones - it's politics, and politics do not belong here.
- _pius 16y ago
  This isn't a political article.
  - davidw 16y ago
    It also has nothing to do with HN, as far as I can tell. And of course the "OMG, disaster could go on forever" is calculated to rile up their readers. I don't know, maybe I'm too skittish about off topic stuff, but I really like this site, and politics is an easy way to derail a community...
    - deleted 16y ago
      [deleted]
    - _pius 16y ago
      ... I really like this site, and politics is an easy way to derail a community ... This isn't a political article.

thaumaturgy 16y ago

Yep, especially since BP's presentation to Congress [1] would indicate that that anonymous commenter doesn't have a complete understanding of what's going on. [1]: http://energycommerce.house.gov/documents/20100527/BP.Presentation.pdf http://energycommerce.house.gov/documents/20100527/BP.Presen...

melvin 16y ago
Nothing that has occurred since the incident has given me the impression that BP has a complete understanding of what's going on.
- megablast 16y ago
  Or, more importantly, the willingness to admit that fact, or to admit the truth. Initially they decried all the people who suggested the flow was much larger than their estimates. Then, more and more sources come out suggesting it. And just recently, they have admitted it might be true. This seems to be modus operandi for companies these days. Deny everything, then weeks later come up with your own sources suggesting exactly the same thing, when the issue has died down.
- billswift 16y ago
  Nothing that has happened in the last 40 years has given me any reason to believe that anybody, or even everybody in aggregate, has a complete understanding of much of anything that is going on.
joe_the_user 16y ago
Uh... What is this link supposed to prove? It's a diagram of the failure modes of the BOP and some discussion of how it failed. I can't see any indication it shows the well under the BOP is intact or that the movement of high pressure oil-and-sand isn't chewing the assembly to pieces as BP tries to suck some of the oil out of the well.

davidw 16y ago

Agreed. I've bitched about seeing right (or libertarian)-wing propaganda sites like mises.org here - same thing goes for motherjones - it's politics, and politics do not belong here.

_pius 16y ago
This isn't a political article.
- davidw 16y ago
  It also has nothing to do with HN, as far as I can tell. And of course the "OMG, disaster could go on forever" is calculated to rile up their readers. I don't know, maybe I'm too skittish about off topic stuff, but I really like this site, and politics is an easy way to derail a community...
  - deleted 16y ago
    [deleted]
  - _pius 16y ago
    ... I really like this site, and politics is an easy way to derail a community ... This isn't a political article.