6 ms·
> How about that stupid TV show with a magical button that turned on and off electricity? I think you're talking about "Revolution" which had JJ Abrams splatte
by philbarr 9y ago
> How about that stupid TV show with a magical button that turned on and off electricity?
I think you're talking about "Revolution" which had JJ Abrams splattered all over the adverts.
I watched one episode and thought, after Lost, "I'm not falling for this again."
- Cyph0n 9y ago"Revolution" proved to me that Lindelof was the more interesting one from the "Lost" duo. Case in point: Lindelof's "The Leftovers" is one of the best shows airing right now.
- prodmerc 9y agoThe leftovers is still on? Damn, who the hell watches that...
- Cyph0n 9y agoOh man, "The Leftovers" is an amazing show in my opinion, but it's definitely not for the faint of heart. Another gem I discovered this year is Amazon's "Patriot". Coincidentally, it features one of the main actors from "Lost" :P
- technofiend 9y agoI classify horror movies and post-apocalyptic shows like The Walking Dead as "bad things happen to good people for no reason other than plotline." I can only watch so much of that before it wears me out because there are no surprises and nothing beyond temporary respite for the characters. As you say, it requires viewers be really invested to watch everyone die, but if anyone can do it George R.R. Martin can. The old joke is if people bother him enough about the next Game of Thrones book it'll just be 1,000 pages of snow blowing across graves. When he's done with the series I'm not sure how many characters, readers or viewers will be left. Even so he's the only author I can point to who can create compelling enough content that people may stay to the end. I'll never watch another Walking Dead or Leftovers because I just don't care enough about the characters, but George will probably manage to drag me to the end of GoT. Damn you, George.
- technofiend 9y agoYeah, I think I was blocking the show name like some childhood trauma. I was a little surprised JJ did such a poor job for backstory but then again don't get me started on his Star Trek reboots. :grumble:
- tnecniv 9y agoI've seen probably a half dozen things JJ has worked on, but none of them end up being any good. He normally starts out with a pretty good premise, but it rapidly becomes apparent that he doesn't know what to do with it. Besides Star Trek (at least the first one, the second one is a different story) and Star Wars, Fringe and Super 8 jump to mind. Fortunately Stranger Things got to be what Super 8 could have been.
- e12e 9y agoInterestingly enough, they sort of save the hard sci-fi plot of revolution ; they just take a number of seasons to pull the origin of the nano-tech scourge out of the hat (yes, it was well intentioned, yes self-replicating nano-tech turned out to be a bad idea, yes there was a command and control feature built in).