3 ms·
That's how much they had left when they died - not what they had when they retired. So that's after the 20-30 years of living off those savings...
by djrogers 9y ago
That's how much they had left when they died - not what they had when they retired. So that's after the 20-30 years of living off those savings...
- drew1492 9y agoSpending down your principal may not be a smart idea though, especially if one is in good health. It runs the risk of them outliving their savings. Spending 4% or less of your assets annually is sustainable indefinitely, statistically speaking.
- TheCoelacanth 9y agoThat's optimal from an individual perspective, but not necessarily from a societal perspective. The author suggests it might be better if people had insurance which paid an annuity after reaching a certain age (say 80) and then people could plan to have their savings run out at 80 instead of everyone having to plan to live until 100 with only a tiny fraction making it to that age.