5 ms·
If the distribution of skill is independent of sex (your assumption, if I understand correctly), why do you think the allocation is inefficient? If less women
by tomp 10y ago
If the distribution of skill is independent of sex (your assumption, if I understand correctly), why do you think the allocation is inefficient?
If less women and more men were primary caregivers, then the outcome would be exactly the same as it is now, because skill is independent of sex.
- Dylan16807 10y agoYou're assuming that the primary caregiver will be randomly chosen. aaronblohowiak is assuming that the parent with better professional skills is more likely to work professionally, and the parent with better child-rearing skills is more likely to be the primary caregiver. This would lead to better outcomes everywhere.