3 ms·

Looks very nice! But: GPLv3 and code generation is a scary combo. Do you sell a commercial license? If not, you should add a license exception.

• gschier 9y ago
  Good point. I didn't think that GPL-generated code must abide by the same license, but it seems to be a debated topic. Best to be safe.
  • deleted 9y ago
    [deleted]
  • chii 9y ago
    the output of a program is generally not licensed the same as the program, unless by prior agreement. But of course, IANAL...
    • cyphar 9y ago
      Unless the output contains the source code of the program. That's the reason for the GNU Bison additional permissions clause.
• matt4077 9y ago
  You should find out if Harry Potter was written in Word and buy some MS stocks, then.
• jfoutz 9y ago
  gcc would like to have a word with you.
  • gnud 9y ago
    GCC already has a license exception, because the output includes code written for GCC, as well as code written by the user.
    • jfoutz 9y ago
      Well, kinda. GCC includes an exemption for the runtime.
      • gnud 9y ago
        Yes - the runtime is added to your compiled source and provides a combined work. Not linked as a dynamic library.