3 ms·
How much slower was the hash table when mapped across two physical memory domains vs on the same one? I recall sometime back that Facebook specifically went wi
by alberth 10y ago
How much slower was the hash table when mapped across two physical memory domains vs on the same one?
I recall sometime back that Facebook specifically went with the Xeon-D processor for exactly this reason. Since Xeon D is single socket, it prevents NUMA type of issues.
- dekhn 10y agoIt was about 50% slower. I would have expected more- 50% of the pages were on the opposite processor, and I expect the cost of a cross-processor communication (on a busy server) would be more than 2X a local memory lookup. We didn't even know there was a performance problem there- we just wanted to make the program faster, and ran perf, visualizing IPC and sorted by the routines with the lowest IPC (actually, we called it by the reciprocal, CPI, which I find a bit more intuitive). It sort of just provided a bright, blinking sign pointing right at the location causing a huge problem. Once that was solved, you could just select the next item on the list as the next thing to optimize :)
- electrum 10y agoThe Facebook server design is discussed here: https://code.facebook.com/posts/1711485769063510/facebook-s-new-front-end-server-design-delivers-on-performance-without-sucking-up-power/ https://code.facebook.com/posts/1711485769063510/facebook-s-...