3 ms·
I really can't tell whether this is an outright scam, or an earnest attempt by someone completely unqualified (and completely unaware that they're unqualified,
by NoGravitas 10y ago
I really can't tell whether this is an outright scam, or an earnest attempt by someone completely unqualified (and completely unaware that they're unqualified, per Dunning and Kruger).
- pbhjpbhj 10y agoI'm feeling it's an earnest attempt by someone to set up a p2p email system (that will also send email normally), that wasn't quite finished (like: how will we handle certs, what about dynamic IPs) but was picked up by someone good at marketing who convinced then it was awesome and has created a tidy looking package, etc.. I actually like the idea: a plug-and-play email device that will do p2p with your known contacts. Just needs more development to make it work, and then some more to make it work securely!? With IPv6 some issues could be solved. Are there other examples of similar systems?
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- i336_ 10y agoI actually wondered the same thing in the summary comment I posted.
- Giroflex 10y agoAt the very least there was bad faith from trying to stall and making false claims about updates and disclosure to costumers in the e-mail chain between Scott and them. I'd also doubt they "had two of the largest security firms provide remote and "in hand" vulnerability assessments on nomx", or else they just completely ignored their advice.