4 ms·

Probably gonna get down-voted but if your interested into some facts about Jimmy Wales take a look here: http://www.naturalnews.com/051060_wikipedia_Jimmy_Wales

by red023 9y ago

Probably gonna get down-voted but if your interested into some facts about Jimmy Wales take a look here: http://www.naturalnews.com/051060_wikipedia_Jimmy_Wales_extortion_racket.html# http://www.naturalnews.com/051060_wikipedia_Jimmy_Wales_exto... I just quickly fond this, I was actually looking for a fact that Wales also created some sort of thing that helped the corrupt government do corrupt things. That is actually even missing from that list. He is married to Kate Garvey is an English public relations executive and a former aide to prime minister Tony Blair. He is a establishment shill and not a independent person. Even if he would be I do not want anyone decide for me what is fake news or not. The entire fake news hype is getting really annoying. It's the governments way to introduce censorship via backdoor.

ErikBjare 9y ago
Pretty hard to take your claim seriously when you rely on sources like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_News https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_News
- red023 9y ago
  How about you go down the list step by step and actually debunk the claims instead of claiming the source is not reliable. What is actually wrong in that article? Clap Clap you read a Wikipedia Article. Yes I trust Michael Adams with a lot of stuff, not everything. Yes I am a horrible anti-waxxer anti GMO who dares to believe that natural healthy lifestyle is better that taking a lot of chemicals sold by big Pharma. And yes I am also a "conspiracy theorist" (CIA invented term to shut down opposition after the JFK assassination) Nobody in their right minds can believe their magic bullet lone wolf assassin fairytale, and in fact about around 50% of Americans do not. I am actually well educated on many topics that Natural News covers and mainly not from Natural News, still coming to the same conclusions. On the German Wikipedia they have a lot of defamatory Articles about people who dare to question the status quo. They refuse to let up edit the Articles objectively and it has been proven that the admins, the top 200 of Wikipedias Editors and Admins are in fact organized in various radical leftists organizations. And that they abuse their power and are anything but unbiased.
che_shirecat 9y ago
>facts >naturalnews.com

by red023 9y ago

ErikBjare 9y ago

Pretty hard to take your claim seriously when you rely on sources like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_News https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_News

red023 9y ago
How about you go down the list step by step and actually debunk the claims instead of claiming the source is not reliable. What is actually wrong in that article? Clap Clap you read a Wikipedia Article. Yes I trust Michael Adams with a lot of stuff, not everything. Yes I am a horrible anti-waxxer anti GMO who dares to believe that natural healthy lifestyle is better that taking a lot of chemicals sold by big Pharma. And yes I am also a "conspiracy theorist" (CIA invented term to shut down opposition after the JFK assassination) Nobody in their right minds can believe their magic bullet lone wolf assassin fairytale, and in fact about around 50% of Americans do not. I am actually well educated on many topics that Natural News covers and mainly not from Natural News, still coming to the same conclusions. On the German Wikipedia they have a lot of defamatory Articles about people who dare to question the status quo. They refuse to let up edit the Articles objectively and it has been proven that the admins, the top 200 of Wikipedias Editors and Admins are in fact organized in various radical leftists organizations. And that they abuse their power and are anything but unbiased.

che_shirecat 9y ago

>facts >naturalnews.com