2 ms·
Perhaps I'm missing some of the context, but I don't see the problem of publishing low quality fictional literature. In contrast to science publications, where
by folli 10y ago
Perhaps I'm missing some of the context, but I don't see the problem of publishing low quality fictional literature.
In contrast to science publications, where the reader expects that some scientific quality standards have been met, I'd assume that the market demand will be enough to wipe out low-quality entertainment publications.
- Dylan16807 10y agoThere's nothing wrong with printing bad literature. The problem was their lying about being a traditional publisher that only accepted high quality manuscripts, flattering people to fleece money out of them.
- emeraldd 10y agoThat's not how these "publishers" work. They don't rely on the ability to sell the final product to make money. What they do is charge the hapless and naive, budding author for the privilege of being published and various associated "services." i.e. They make money by fleecing authors who don't know any better.