> If you make a transaction and everyone moves onto a different chain in order to effectively cancel your transaction, that's censorship of transactions. If y

> If you make a transaction and everyone moves onto a different chain in order to effectively cancel your transaction, that's censorship of transactions. If you don't like what NYT says, and you cancel your subscription and subscribe to WSJ (and let's just say that millions of people do the same thing, possibly due to some event), have you effectively censored NYT then? The fact is, censorship has a meaning, and the way you're using the language, abuses that. We didn't censor Ubuntu when because of their unity decision lots of people moved to Linux Mint or to other distros. We didn't censor Digg when it lost a huge traffic to Reddit after the v3 changes. Uber wasn't censored when after the controversial immigration changes by Trump, people started to delete uber app and ride Lyft. Censorship is when an organization forces your speech from all effective expression. Will ETC be invoking censorship when they hard fork to eliminate the upcoming Ice Age baked into the Ethereum protocol?