8 ms·
Gosh that’s old. The original paper was from 2001, the Shmoo group wrote about it in 2005 - https://blogs.oracle.com/yakshaving/entry/so_not_funny_shmoo_group h
by stereo 9y ago
Gosh that’s old. The original paper was from 2001, the Shmoo group wrote about it in 2005 - https://blogs.oracle.com/yakshaving/entry/so_not_funny_shmoo_group https://blogs.oracle.com/yakshaving/entry/so_not_funny_shmoo... - and Joi Ito and I were able to register Veriѕign.com then, to highlight how their greedy mismanagement of .com made this possible.
Three possible solutions, not mutually incompatible:
* Make the browsers catch it - Chrome just shows characters that look like apple.com here, and shouldn’t.
* Whitelist character sets that are allowed to be mixed, at the registry level - it should only be possible to mix cyrillic-latin homoglyphs with cyrillic non-homoglyphs.
* Don’t allow IDNs on gTLDs - if you want “écriture”, get écriture.fr, not .com
Obviously, the registries have a conflict of interest here, and won’t let 2 and 3 happen on .com because it would cut into Verisign's revenue.
See also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IDN_homograph_attack https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IDN_homograph_attack
- darklajid 9y agoI'm not quite sure if I understand your second suggestion. Isn't that what the article claims to circumvent? I read that as 'Firefox/Chrome already do not render these characters, unless they're all from the same subset' - and the 'apple.com' is presented as completely cyrillic (I don't know/understand that alphabet and might've missed either your point or misread the article).
- ko27 9y agoUpdate your Chrome
- runeks 9y agoThere are no updates to Chrome for iPad in the App Store, and it looks like this: http://i.imgur.com/JjR5evp.jpg http://i.imgur.com/JjR5evp.jpg
- Dylan16807 9y agoAs far as I understand it the actual solution is that registries aren't supposed to let you buy a domain that looks like an existing domain. But that's broken? And this domain isn't made of mixed characters.