4 ms·
Interesting. Was anyone even remotely picturing something like this? Congratulations to the Wercker team, but for anyone on the "Never Oracle (again)" train, t
by puzzle 10y ago
Interesting. Was anyone even remotely picturing something like this?
Congratulations to the Wercker team, but for anyone on the "Never Oracle (again)" train, this means one less option for CD/CI. My only exception is VirtualBox.
- nhumrich 10y agoYep. My team is currently on wercker. I will now be finding an alternative.
- kkapelon 10y agoIf you are on Java this mega comparison might help. http://blog.codepipes.com/hosted-ci-comparison/hosted-ci-comparison.html http://blog.codepipes.com/hosted-ci-comparison/hosted-ci-com...
- kt9 10y agoThanks for that great honest comparison. We're working on caching support.
- dragonwriter 10y ago> If you are on Java ...that's a pretty bad place to be on if your on the Never Oracle train.
- fnord123 10y agoI was. They are squeezed by Travis, Jenkins, and other CI systems. Then gitlab added CI so there's nothing for gitlab to compete on so they just needed to get bought.
- fnord123 10y agoDerp. There's nothing for wercker to compete on (afaict).