2 ms·
> Since the issues they can vote on are restricted by the Constitution, it's not really a big deal. I don't agree. The U.S. Senate is very powerful; those rest
by hackuser 9y ago
> Since the issues they can vote on are restricted by the Constitution, it's not really a big deal.
I don't agree. The U.S. Senate is very powerful; those restrictions aren't very broad.
> the simple 50% majority is by design
It depends what you mean. The filibuster, which requires 60% majority, has been part of the Senate since around the 1840s; clearly many generations of Senators thought it was important and intended that it continue.
- aanm1988 9y agoYeah, but the republicans do what they want. Many probably thought the whole actually voting on supreme court nominees should continue.
- int_19h 9y agoThe filibuster was always removable by a simple majority, though, so it was a self-applied restriction, not an external one. Which limited its efficiency greatly - anyone relying on filibuster knew that if they pushed too hard, it would go away.
- hackuser 9y ago> The filibuster was ... It is ... it's still there, just not for confirmations of appointments by the executive branch.