3 ms·
Those aren't fake facts. They are facts. I don't really dispute their legitimacy, they could be absolutely correct and I could be wrong. It's my own view, you d
by harwoodleon 10y ago
Those aren't fake facts. They are facts. I don't really dispute their legitimacy, they could be absolutely correct and I could be wrong. It's my own view, you don't have to hold it for me.
However, this is not either or, which fact is correct or not, this is a sum game. We all add to the problem.
Have those facts true or not, helped in any way to reduce the carbon output. 2-3% might seem insignificant - it may be the 2-3% that tips us into a runaway climate.
So, move near to your family, help save 2-3% per year. I did.
Anyway, making yourself feel better by arguing with me, proving me wrong won't alter the amount of greenhouse gasses in the atmosphere. Stopping flying will. You have a choice.
- antisthenes 10y agoWell said. But, given the choice, I would rather remove my 2-3% of emissions by cutting meat consumption by 90% and/or driving. Your original post was just yelling at people to stop flying, as if there were no other ways to alter a personal consumption pattern. That's what people took issue with.
- harwoodleon 10y agoNo. I didn't. I didn't say stop flying instead of stopping eating meat. Do both. Go for it. I'd say stopping eating meat will be a lot harder for people than stopping flying.