3 ms·
MapReduce was published in 2004. The paper was two people; the implementation was probably a lot more. Even then, it was just a re-engineering of an earlier cod
by CalChris 10y ago
MapReduce was published in 2004. The paper was two people; the implementation was probably a lot more. Even then, it was just a re-engineering of an earlier code base (read that as multiple available cat skinning technologies). By 2014, it was no longer used, so that's 10 years. Lastly, it wasn't exactly novel.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MapReduce#Lack_of_novelty https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MapReduce#Lack_of_novelty
FWIW, it appears they're giving away the TensorFlow stuff because they lost the mindshare battle between MapReduce+Hadoop and don't want that to happen again.
Again, the $100M figure is an easy (heroic) claim to make but hard to substantiate. Shit's hard. Big shit is really hard.
- londons_explore 10y ago> By 2014, it was no longer used [Citation needed]
- CalChris 10y agohttp://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2014/06/25/google-dumps-mapreduce-favor-new-hyper-scale-analytics-system/ http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2014/06/25/googl...
- dekhn 10y agoYou basically don't know what you're talking about, factually speaking, along a wide range of fact dimensions.
- CalChris 10y agoGood to know that. I was worried.