2 ms·
If the capitalist does not offer compensation at a profit, then there is no reason for the capital. If you take it by force, he no longer has any reason to oper
by microcolonel 10y ago
If the capitalist does not offer compensation at a profit, then there is no reason for the capital. If you take it by force, he no longer has any reason to operate it.
Why should the capitalist suffer for free, and the worker destroy the capitalist's work for no gain?
- danbruc 10y agoI am probably misunderstanding what you want to say, but I never said that the capitalist should not be compensated for his work or the workers should destroy any work.
- pbhjpbhj 10y ago>If the capitalist does not offer compensation at a profit, then there is no reason for the capital. Altruism is a reason. There's no reason founded on greed; and the rich person would then need to provide productive labour.