4 ms·
You could put this more nicely - they have spent alot of time working on it. I'm sure no-one intends "BULLSHIT". One way to handle it when something strikes y
by hoodoof 10y ago
You could put this more nicely - they have spent alot of time working on it. I'm sure no-one intends "BULLSHIT".
One way to handle it when something strikes you as not correct is to politely ask for clarification.
- snackai 10y agoWell no. A Global latency of 2.8 ms is just bullshit. As others pointed out, they did not beat the speed of light. I hate stuff like this. If you really have a worthy product just point out what it really can do, not what in a lab environment worked once.
- btilly 10y agoI agree with the buzzword bingo complaint, but they really do have a claim that is defensible here. Their claim is that you can run an application distributed in a cloud around the world with data in their database, and read queries to their database will get results in an average of 2.8 ms. This puts a lot of caveats on that 2.8 ms claim, and makes it something that is both good and believable. Which makes the claim very much not bullshit.
- realPubkey 10y agoSnackai is right. Bullshit stays bullshit.