15 ms·

Introducing FreeNAS Corral

139 points by pstadler 10y ago

shad0wca7 10y ago
I've been using FreeNAS 9.10 for just under a year now having originally moved from Ubuntu Server. Its feature set, ease of use and stability really is incredible. Can't wait to try Corral out.
gsnedders 10y ago
What's FreeNAS like from a security point-of-view nowadays? How is it with security updates being pushed out? How about default configuration?
- Ajedi32 10y ago
  You can set up email notifications to have your server email you when new updates are available. They come out semi-frequently; maybe monthly. You can install them from the web interface pretty easily; major updates usually require a reboot. By default I think the only way to access FreeNAS is through the web interface (which seems fairly secure, though I'm not really all that familiar with FreeNAS's codebase). No SSL by default, but you can set it up with self-signed certs almost trivially using FreeNAS's GUI. You can enable SSH access and other services manually, and those services come with their own set of security concerns you need to be aware of.
lisnake 10y ago
Wow, I didn't realise that FreeNAS had come so far. Featureset looks amazing and better than most of enterprise solutions.
- Ajedi32 10y ago
  I didn't either, and I'm running FreeNAS 9 on my server at home. I didn't realize FreeNAS 10 was such a huge improvement.
  - mattdotc 10y ago
    Before rushing to upgrade, take note that they are abandoning the plugin system for, what I believe is, a docker-based approach for services. Don't quote me on that second part, but I'm fairly certain you will need to reconfigure any services which are presently running as a plugin. If you have custom jails, then you really don't need my advice :)
    - pstadler 10y ago
      Yes, be careful, your jails won't run on Corral. I've just migrated yesterday and managed to replace all my jails with Docker containers, although the road was a bit bumpy, at least when it comes to the containers UI which is buggy as hell currently. All in all I'm delighted. The CLI is great, the UI buggy but definitely better, and no more jails but proper containers instead. Congratulations to the team and thank you for delivering.
- snuxoll 10y ago
  Bear in mind, ixSystems HAS an enterprise solution based on FreeNAS called TrueNAS - we bought two appliances with 72TB if usable storage to handle image storage for our ECM suite which has BILLIONS of small images. The things run like a champ, and outside some minor issues with the AD integration we've taken care of they've been a great storage solution.
  - defgeneric 10y ago
    Same experience with FreeNAS 9.x and AD. But... I just upgraded to FreeNAS 10/Corral and the AD integration just worked! Previously there was a `generate_smb4_conf.py` script that translated the UI selections into a `smb4.conf` file, but our AD had some weird schema issues that required a custom config. I ended up hacking parts of the generator script to get it to produce the right thing. In FreeNAS 10 it seems they switched to samba's Registry Configuration [1]. [1] https://www.samba.org/~obnox/presentations/linux-kongress-2008/lk2008-obnox.pdf https://www.samba.org/~obnox/presentations/linux-kongress-20...
    - snuxoll 10y ago
      My issue was actually the way their HA setup attempted to configure itself with duplicate SPN's - I ended up needing to manually export a key tab with ktpass to use it instead of getting it via winbind.
grk 10y ago
I'm wondering, what's the usecase for Docker there?
- pat2man 10y ago
  I could see lots of use cases for running small apps directly on your NAS. Maintenance tools, monitoring, etc. Synology has lots of "apps" that run on their NAS solution: https://www.synology.com/en-us/dsm/app_packages/all_app https://www.synology.com/en-us/dsm/app_packages/all_app. This could easily cover that use case.
- lykron 10y ago
  They've always had the functionality to run software like Transmission inside a Jail. I guess they just moved that functionality to docker to be more "hip".
  - thecabinet 10y ago
    FreeNAS 9.10 includes 28 plugins. Docker Hub has 500,000 images.
  - haswell 10y ago
    It goes beyond just being "hip". It's about mindshare, which is extremely important when you want user-contributed plugins.
  - mattdotc 10y ago
    As I understand it, the plugin system is poorly documented, and it seemed like most of the popular ones were being maintained by one guy: https://github.com/josh4trunks/freenas-plugins https://github.com/josh4trunks/freenas-plugins
  - X86BSD 10y ago
    Reminds me of the joke, "How do you get docker to be secure? Run it inside a (FreeBSD) jail." Having not looked at it that's my guess what they are doing. Everything related to it is in a jail. Making it secure regardless of dockers questionable security.
rustynails 10y ago
According to the release notes, you can update to Corral and roll back to 9.10 via the GUI. The system requirements are still 8gb RAM and 8gb disk minimum. There are no details of the performance. Release notes are here. https://download.freenas.org/Corral/RELEASE/ReleaseNotes.txt https://download.freenas.org/Corral/RELEASE/ReleaseNotes.txt
X86BSD 10y ago
Well done iXsystems and FreeNAS developers! You blow the doors literally off everything else.
noja 10y ago
Damn nice. Can it import btrfs volumes?
- davemtl 10y ago
  No, FreeNAS is ZFS only.
  - noja 10y ago
    I was hoping it could read them so I can migrate.
    - patrickg_zill 10y ago
      Couldn't you just NFS export and copy or even use rsync?
      - noja 10y ago
        Sure, with another NAS :)
- patrickg_zill 10y ago
  I doubt FreeBSD can read btrfs volumes directly; however if they let you set up a fully virtualized VM (i.e. appears like its own hardware and you could install Windows under it), then you could create the correct sized VM, install your OS, then migrate.
- Terribledactyl 10y ago
  The ideal case would be to get a new ZFS system and copy over the network. Depending on how big your data is, and how many spare drives you have, you could probably do something hacky like creating a small ZFS pool on linux, empty a btrfs drive, and then move it over to ZFS. At that point you could export that system and switch over to FreeNAS. But the end result wouldn't be optimal, pretty far from it. edit: just to clarify ZFS under Linux isn't hacky, ubuntu 16.04 makes it pretty nice, rather this particular suggestion is hacky.
- 10y ago
mrbill 10y ago
Does this version still require a tiny slice of every data-storage drive be used as swap? I've got hardware built up but am still debating NAS4FREE vs FreeNAS.
- justinclift 10y ago
  In FreeNAS 9.10, that's configurable via the webUI. Haven't tried the released version of Corral though, so unsure if it's carried through.
- Fzzr 10y ago
  Yes, but I believe it can be disabled as in 8.x and 9.x.
littleboxes 10y ago
Does it support heterogeneous drives?
- Fzzr 10y ago
  Yes, you can put drives of similar sizes in raid groups ("vdevs") together and then stripe together dissimilar groups. You can also put them all together in one big group, but in that case the group will act as though all the drives are the size of the smallest one and waste the rest of the space. Example disks: * 2x 500GB * 4x 1TB Example of first option: * Mirror of 500GB: 500GB * RAID-Z of 1TB: 3TB * Total Usable Storage: 3.5TB * Total Overhead (Redundancy): 1.5TB * Pool fails if any two drives of the same size are lost Example of second option: * RAID-Z1 of all: 2.5TB (Effectively RAID-Z1 of 6x500TB) * Total Usable Storage: 2.5TB * Total Overhead (Redundancy): 500TB * Total Wasted: 2TB * Pool fails if any two drives are lost Terminology/facts in case any reader doesn't know: * A mirror is what you'd think, basically RAID 1. * A RAID-Z(1) is a RAID group with a single disk worth of redundancy, like RAID 5. * RAID-Z2 and RAID-Z3 are two- and three-disk redundancy groups respectively. * ZFS can stripe together any number of similar or dissimilar groups of drives, but if any one such group is lost the entire pool is corrupted. Edited for formatting Edit Edit: These behaviors are due to ZFS, not choices made by the FreeNAS developers.
- colechristensen 10y ago
  The answer is complicated. ZFS wasn't designed with a small number of heterogeneous drive sizes in mind. If you don't care about redundancy then you can span a volume across as many odd drives as you want free and clear. If you do care about redundancy, you need sets of similar drives put together and then it only makes sense if you have a large number of drives. Raidz has performance penalties and should only be used with a large number of vdevs unless you care little about speed. An array of mirrors is the best way to go for small to medium sized zfs installations which means pairs of same-sized drives and only 50% available space.
machbio 10y ago
Awesome.. I moved away from FreeNAS to Ubuntu 16.04 ZFS.. Now, back to FreeNAS..
- deleted 10y ago
  [deleted]
abrookewood 10y ago
The only thing stopping me using FreeNAS was that I can't run CrashPlan on BSD. What are others doing for offsite backups?
- X86BSD 10y ago
  Tarsnap. It's the best offsite, secure, cloud storage out there.
- tw04 10y ago
  http://rclone.org/ http://rclone.org/ + amazon cloud drive?
- Ajedi32 10y ago
  You can't? I thought there was a Crashplan plugin? (Also, even if you can't run it on BSD, couldn't you just setup a VirtualBox jail and run Crashplan on that?)
- mrpippy 10y ago
  There's a FreeBSD port for CrashPlan using Linux compatibility, can that be used? https://www.freshports.org/sysutils/linux-crashplan/ https://www.freshports.org/sysutils/linux-crashplan/
- defgeneric 10y ago
  You can now run CrashPlan in a docker container on Corral. (In 9.x it's available as a plugin.)
  - abrookewood 10y ago
    Awesome! Thanks.
beagle3 10y ago
FreeNAS is awesome. Does anyone know of a way to configure FreeNAS (or an alternative FS, such LizardFS or Tahoe LAFS) that can provide the feature set of Isilon OneFS (not the performance) with an open source implementation? That is, 1. to add more storage, just add another machine (everything looks like one big volume, irrespective of machine/disk boundaries). 2. replication / error correction / raid works across the entire fleet of machines; that is, you can configure it so that up to 1-disk per node, and up to 2-nodes overall can die without damage to data 3. snapshots
- Fzzr 10y ago
  1. Not sure how to get a single global namespace on FreeNAS right now, that might require further upgrades to NFS (or maybe it's in 10 now, I haven't tried). 2. Early in the development of FreeNAS 10 SwiftStack, IPFS, and Riak were planned as features. It's still possible those will make it into the project some day, but for now you're on your own for clustering/multi-node use. 3. Snapshots and Snapshot Replication are a core feature of FreeNAS since 8. I don't know where the 10 docs are but in 9.10 they're here: http://doc.freenas.org/9.10/storage.html#snapshots http://doc.freenas.org/9.10/storage.html#snapshots
- urza 10y ago
  If you dont know, take a look at https://infinit.sh https://infinit.sh
  - beagle3 10y ago
    Interesting. The features I asked for are almost all in "enterprise" and there's no price quote yes (or even a mention of whether enterprise is open source - I am willing to pay for a good system, but not for one I can't support myself)
mdekkers 10y ago
oh, shiny. I wonder if there is a way to make this run on my Synology...
captasparagus 10y ago
What is the status of ipfs integration? I know it was part of the v10 roadmap, but I don't see any mention of it in Corral and have been unable to figure out if it features in the Corral roadmap. Corral looks like it would be a great UX for farming disk space for ipfs/filecoin in the future. Thanks.
- Fzzr 10y ago
  Dropped from the 10.0 release. No idea if/when it will make it in. It was working in ALPHA, but only as an experiment.
johnramsden 10y ago
I'm excited to see FreeNAS "Corral" come out and the user interface looks great, however I'm still disappointed that jails are not able to be used. I'm not sad to see the plugins system gone, it was terrible and I always set up my own custom jails on FreeNAS anyway, but It would have been nice to be able to use jails at least from the command line. I guess they don't want to have to worry about supporting both. I just wonder about the extra overhead of having to run a virtual machine for every container as opposed to just running a FreeBSD jail. bhyve is also not as established as FreeBSD jails and I wonder about stability. Now you're having to worry about the stability of bhyve and docker. For just running services like emby, syncthing, SABnzbd or the like I honestly think having the option to just run a FreeBSD jail is superior. Considering it is FreeBSD under the hood I don't see why the option is gone. It's nice to be able to run Docker containers don't get me wrong, but I just wonder if it is really the superior technology.
urza 10y ago
Is it possible to run Windows 10 as guest in Bhyve? I was planning to build my workstation on Ubuntu as host OS. Running few VMs inside - two windows, two linux and managing my ZFS pool (host os directly)... but if FreeNAS can run Windows VMs, it would be ideal...
pmarreck 10y ago
Looks like I lost all my backup configs (from windows via iSCSI and from my Macs via time machine) :/
TheAceOfHearts 10y ago
For any future readers / searchers, it looks like the link was changed [0]. [0] http://www.freenas.org/blog/introducing-freenas-corral-an-open-source-hyper-converged-storage-platform/ http://www.freenas.org/blog/introducing-freenas-corral-an-op...
- dang 10y ago
  Thanks. Updated from http://www.freenas.org/blog/introducing-freenas-corral-worlds-first-open-source-hyper-converged-storage-platform/ http://www.freenas.org/blog/introducing-freenas-corral-world....

139 points by pstadler 10y ago

I've been using FreeNAS 9.10 for just under a year now having originally moved from Ubuntu Server. Its feature set, ease of use and stability really is incredible. Can't wait to try Corral out.

gsnedders 10y ago

What's FreeNAS like from a security point-of-view nowadays? How is it with security updates being pushed out? How about default configuration?

Ajedi32 10y ago
You can set up email notifications to have your server email you when new updates are available. They come out semi-frequently; maybe monthly. You can install them from the web interface pretty easily; major updates usually require a reboot. By default I think the only way to access FreeNAS is through the web interface (which seems fairly secure, though I'm not really all that familiar with FreeNAS's codebase). No SSL by default, but you can set it up with self-signed certs almost trivially using FreeNAS's GUI. You can enable SSH access and other services manually, and those services come with their own set of security concerns you need to be aware of.

lisnake 10y ago

Wow, I didn't realise that FreeNAS had come so far. Featureset looks amazing and better than most of enterprise solutions.

Ajedi32 10y ago
I didn't either, and I'm running FreeNAS 9 on my server at home. I didn't realize FreeNAS 10 was such a huge improvement.
- mattdotc 10y ago
  Before rushing to upgrade, take note that they are abandoning the plugin system for, what I believe is, a docker-based approach for services. Don't quote me on that second part, but I'm fairly certain you will need to reconfigure any services which are presently running as a plugin. If you have custom jails, then you really don't need my advice :)
  - pstadler 10y ago
    Yes, be careful, your jails won't run on Corral. I've just migrated yesterday and managed to replace all my jails with Docker containers, although the road was a bit bumpy, at least when it comes to the containers UI which is buggy as hell currently. All in all I'm delighted. The CLI is great, the UI buggy but definitely better, and no more jails but proper containers instead. Congratulations to the team and thank you for delivering.
snuxoll 10y ago
Bear in mind, ixSystems HAS an enterprise solution based on FreeNAS called TrueNAS - we bought two appliances with 72TB if usable storage to handle image storage for our ECM suite which has BILLIONS of small images. The things run like a champ, and outside some minor issues with the AD integration we've taken care of they've been a great storage solution.
- defgeneric 10y ago
  Same experience with FreeNAS 9.x and AD. But... I just upgraded to FreeNAS 10/Corral and the AD integration just worked! Previously there was a `generate_smb4_conf.py` script that translated the UI selections into a `smb4.conf` file, but our AD had some weird schema issues that required a custom config. I ended up hacking parts of the generator script to get it to produce the right thing. In FreeNAS 10 it seems they switched to samba's Registry Configuration [1]. [1] https://www.samba.org/~obnox/presentations/linux-kongress-2008/lk2008-obnox.pdf https://www.samba.org/~obnox/presentations/linux-kongress-20...
  - snuxoll 10y ago
    My issue was actually the way their HA setup attempted to configure itself with duplicate SPN's - I ended up needing to manually export a key tab with ktpass to use it instead of getting it via winbind.

grk 10y ago

I'm wondering, what's the usecase for Docker there?

pat2man 10y ago
I could see lots of use cases for running small apps directly on your NAS. Maintenance tools, monitoring, etc. Synology has lots of "apps" that run on their NAS solution: https://www.synology.com/en-us/dsm/app_packages/all_app https://www.synology.com/en-us/dsm/app_packages/all_app. This could easily cover that use case.
lykron 10y ago
They've always had the functionality to run software like Transmission inside a Jail. I guess they just moved that functionality to docker to be more "hip".
- thecabinet 10y ago
  FreeNAS 9.10 includes 28 plugins. Docker Hub has 500,000 images.
- haswell 10y ago
  It goes beyond just being "hip". It's about mindshare, which is extremely important when you want user-contributed plugins.
- mattdotc 10y ago
  As I understand it, the plugin system is poorly documented, and it seemed like most of the popular ones were being maintained by one guy: https://github.com/josh4trunks/freenas-plugins https://github.com/josh4trunks/freenas-plugins
- X86BSD 10y ago
  Reminds me of the joke, "How do you get docker to be secure? Run it inside a (FreeBSD) jail." Having not looked at it that's my guess what they are doing. Everything related to it is in a jail. Making it secure regardless of dockers questionable security.

rustynails 10y ago

According to the release notes, you can update to Corral and roll back to 9.10 via the GUI. The system requirements are still 8gb RAM and 8gb disk minimum. There are no details of the performance. Release notes are here. https://download.freenas.org/Corral/RELEASE/ReleaseNotes.txt https://download.freenas.org/Corral/RELEASE/ReleaseNotes.txt

X86BSD 10y ago

Well done iXsystems and FreeNAS developers! You blow the doors literally off everything else.

noja 10y ago

Damn nice. Can it import btrfs volumes?

davemtl 10y ago
No, FreeNAS is ZFS only.
- noja 10y ago
  I was hoping it could read them so I can migrate.
  - patrickg_zill 10y ago
    Couldn't you just NFS export and copy or even use rsync?
    - noja 10y ago
      Sure, with another NAS :)
patrickg_zill 10y ago
I doubt FreeBSD can read btrfs volumes directly; however if they let you set up a fully virtualized VM (i.e. appears like its own hardware and you could install Windows under it), then you could create the correct sized VM, install your OS, then migrate.
Terribledactyl 10y ago
The ideal case would be to get a new ZFS system and copy over the network. Depending on how big your data is, and how many spare drives you have, you could probably do something hacky like creating a small ZFS pool on linux, empty a btrfs drive, and then move it over to ZFS. At that point you could export that system and switch over to FreeNAS. But the end result wouldn't be optimal, pretty far from it. edit: just to clarify ZFS under Linux isn't hacky, ubuntu 16.04 makes it pretty nice, rather this particular suggestion is hacky.
10y ago

mrbill 10y ago

Does this version still require a tiny slice of every data-storage drive be used as swap? I've got hardware built up but am still debating NAS4FREE vs FreeNAS.

justinclift 10y ago
In FreeNAS 9.10, that's configurable via the webUI. Haven't tried the released version of Corral though, so unsure if it's carried through.
Fzzr 10y ago
Yes, but I believe it can be disabled as in 8.x and 9.x.

littleboxes 10y ago

Does it support heterogeneous drives?

Fzzr 10y ago
Yes, you can put drives of similar sizes in raid groups ("vdevs") together and then stripe together dissimilar groups. You can also put them all together in one big group, but in that case the group will act as though all the drives are the size of the smallest one and waste the rest of the space. Example disks: * 2x 500GB * 4x 1TB Example of first option: * Mirror of 500GB: 500GB * RAID-Z of 1TB: 3TB * Total Usable Storage: 3.5TB * Total Overhead (Redundancy): 1.5TB * Pool fails if any two drives of the same size are lost Example of second option: * RAID-Z1 of all: 2.5TB (Effectively RAID-Z1 of 6x500TB) * Total Usable Storage: 2.5TB * Total Overhead (Redundancy): 500TB * Total Wasted: 2TB * Pool fails if any two drives are lost Terminology/facts in case any reader doesn't know: * A mirror is what you'd think, basically RAID 1. * A RAID-Z(1) is a RAID group with a single disk worth of redundancy, like RAID 5. * RAID-Z2 and RAID-Z3 are two- and three-disk redundancy groups respectively. * ZFS can stripe together any number of similar or dissimilar groups of drives, but if any one such group is lost the entire pool is corrupted. Edited for formatting Edit Edit: These behaviors are due to ZFS, not choices made by the FreeNAS developers.
colechristensen 10y ago
The answer is complicated. ZFS wasn't designed with a small number of heterogeneous drive sizes in mind. If you don't care about redundancy then you can span a volume across as many odd drives as you want free and clear. If you do care about redundancy, you need sets of similar drives put together and then it only makes sense if you have a large number of drives. Raidz has performance penalties and should only be used with a large number of vdevs unless you care little about speed. An array of mirrors is the best way to go for small to medium sized zfs installations which means pairs of same-sized drives and only 50% available space.

machbio 10y ago

Awesome.. I moved away from FreeNAS to Ubuntu 16.04 ZFS.. Now, back to FreeNAS..

deleted 10y ago
[deleted]

abrookewood 10y ago

The only thing stopping me using FreeNAS was that I can't run CrashPlan on BSD. What are others doing for offsite backups?

X86BSD 10y ago
Tarsnap. It's the best offsite, secure, cloud storage out there.
tw04 10y ago
http://rclone.org/ http://rclone.org/ + amazon cloud drive?
Ajedi32 10y ago
You can't? I thought there was a Crashplan plugin? (Also, even if you can't run it on BSD, couldn't you just setup a VirtualBox jail and run Crashplan on that?)
mrpippy 10y ago
There's a FreeBSD port for CrashPlan using Linux compatibility, can that be used? https://www.freshports.org/sysutils/linux-crashplan/ https://www.freshports.org/sysutils/linux-crashplan/
defgeneric 10y ago
You can now run CrashPlan in a docker container on Corral. (In 9.x it's available as a plugin.)
- abrookewood 10y ago
  Awesome! Thanks.

beagle3 10y ago

FreeNAS is awesome. Does anyone know of a way to configure FreeNAS (or an alternative FS, such LizardFS or Tahoe LAFS) that can provide the feature set of Isilon OneFS (not the performance) with an open source implementation? That is, 1. to add more storage, just add another machine (everything looks like one big volume, irrespective of machine/disk boundaries). 2. replication / error correction / raid works across the entire fleet of machines; that is, you can configure it so that up to 1-disk per node, and up to 2-nodes overall can die without damage to data 3. snapshots

Fzzr 10y ago
1. Not sure how to get a single global namespace on FreeNAS right now, that might require further upgrades to NFS (or maybe it's in 10 now, I haven't tried). 2. Early in the development of FreeNAS 10 SwiftStack, IPFS, and Riak were planned as features. It's still possible those will make it into the project some day, but for now you're on your own for clustering/multi-node use. 3. Snapshots and Snapshot Replication are a core feature of FreeNAS since 8. I don't know where the 10 docs are but in 9.10 they're here: http://doc.freenas.org/9.10/storage.html#snapshots http://doc.freenas.org/9.10/storage.html#snapshots
urza 10y ago
If you dont know, take a look at https://infinit.sh https://infinit.sh
- beagle3 10y ago
  Interesting. The features I asked for are almost all in "enterprise" and there's no price quote yes (or even a mention of whether enterprise is open source - I am willing to pay for a good system, but not for one I can't support myself)

mdekkers 10y ago

oh, shiny. I wonder if there is a way to make this run on my Synology...

captasparagus 10y ago

What is the status of ipfs integration? I know it was part of the v10 roadmap, but I don't see any mention of it in Corral and have been unable to figure out if it features in the Corral roadmap. Corral looks like it would be a great UX for farming disk space for ipfs/filecoin in the future. Thanks.

Fzzr 10y ago
Dropped from the 10.0 release. No idea if/when it will make it in. It was working in ALPHA, but only as an experiment.

johnramsden 10y ago

I'm excited to see FreeNAS "Corral" come out and the user interface looks great, however I'm still disappointed that jails are not able to be used. I'm not sad to see the plugins system gone, it was terrible and I always set up my own custom jails on FreeNAS anyway, but It would have been nice to be able to use jails at least from the command line. I guess they don't want to have to worry about supporting both. I just wonder about the extra overhead of having to run a virtual machine for every container as opposed to just running a FreeBSD jail. bhyve is also not as established as FreeBSD jails and I wonder about stability. Now you're having to worry about the stability of bhyve and docker. For just running services like emby, syncthing, SABnzbd or the like I honestly think having the option to just run a FreeBSD jail is superior. Considering it is FreeBSD under the hood I don't see why the option is gone. It's nice to be able to run Docker containers don't get me wrong, but I just wonder if it is really the superior technology.

urza 10y ago

Is it possible to run Windows 10 as guest in Bhyve? I was planning to build my workstation on Ubuntu as host OS. Running few VMs inside - two windows, two linux and managing my ZFS pool (host os directly)... but if FreeNAS can run Windows VMs, it would be ideal...

pmarreck 10y ago

Looks like I lost all my backup configs (from windows via iSCSI and from my Macs via time machine) :/

TheAceOfHearts 10y ago

For any future readers / searchers, it looks like the link was changed [0]. [0] http://www.freenas.org/blog/introducing-freenas-corral-an-open-source-hyper-converged-storage-platform/ http://www.freenas.org/blog/introducing-freenas-corral-an-op...

dang 10y ago
Thanks. Updated from http://www.freenas.org/blog/introducing-freenas-corral-worlds-first-open-source-hyper-converged-storage-platform/ http://www.freenas.org/blog/introducing-freenas-corral-world....