I am curious how you would define "spying" though. - Should NGA not use imaging satellites to keep track of national disasters and environmental issues? - Sho

I am curious how you would define "spying" though. - Should NGA not use imaging satellites to keep track of national disasters and environmental issues? - Should NGA not use imaging satellites for nuclear non-proliferation monitoring? - Should DoD not have digital sensors at the egress points of their networks to gather information on attacks by foreign actors? - Should NSA not monitor the communications of foreign adversaries to determine their intentions on the battlefield? - Should NSA not investigate adversarial nations launching attacks and information-gathering operations against DoD infrastructure as well as US private industry? - Should our military intelligence branches not monitor weapons development of adversarial nations (using ELINT measurements, imaging satellites, along with other forms of intelligence gathering to determine their offensive/defensive capabilities) - Should we not use SIGINT sensors and capabilities to detect an incoming attack on the USA or an ally? - I can add a whole lot more to this list if interested. The act of "spying" is far more than just SIGINT collection and processing of internet data. Can you elaborate on what you specifically take issue with? Do you take issue with all intelligence collection as a whole, or specifically SIGINT collection, or more specifically SIGINT collection of internet data or phone records? I am curious and like to keep an open mind about these things, so am being genuine when I ask this.