3 ms·
Equating outdated city-level taxi regulations to universal law punishing murder is disingenuous, to say the least. FTC did a report [1] in 1984 about taxi regu
by eddieplan9 10y ago
Equating outdated city-level taxi regulations to universal law punishing murder is disingenuous, to say the least.
FTC did a report [1] in 1984 about taxi regulations and pointed out why cities were not well-equipped nor incentivized to regulate for the purpose of market efficiency:
> There are, in fact, reasons to doubt that existing regulations are efficient. One problem is
that the analytical and informatiqnal problems involved in determining the efficient levels of the relevant policy variables are great. It is doubtful that regulatory authorities generally have the necessary expertise or information to determine these levels. Also, taxi ordinances and the government agencies that issue taxi regulations may not be motivated primarily by concern
for market failure and achievement of an efficient resource allocation. It appears that taxi regulations have often been designed to protect public transit systems and existing taxi firms from competition.
[1] https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/reports/economic-analysis-taxicab-regulation/233832.pdf https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/reports/ec...
- lordnacho 10y agoIt's totally irrelevant what the crime is, whether you like the rules or not, or whether the rules are economically efficient. The point is you can't obstruct law enforcement from detecting that you've broken the rules.