3 ms·
I can do it too, look: burden is on the you to show that "10x programmer" is not "an expression, a saying or an image". Plenty people consider the term to be n
by sametmax 10y ago
I can do it too, look:
burden is on the you to show that "10x programmer" is not "an expression, a saying or an image". Plenty people consider the term to be not literal, and argue as such all over HN.
- bsilvereagle 10y agoYou may find one of the studies credited with creating the idea of the "10x programmer" interesting to skim: http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/645438.pdf http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/645438.pdf
- Chris2048 10y agohttps://www.techopedia.com/definition/31673/10x-developer https://www.techopedia.com/definition/31673/10x-developer See top answer here: http://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/179616/a-good-programmer-can-be-as-10x-times-more-productive-than-a-mediocre-one http://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/17961... The "10 times" didn't come from nowhere, people who use the term to simply mean a great (and not literally "ten times productive") programmer ignore the origin of the term.
- Chris2048 10y ago> Plenty people consider the term to be not literal, and argue as such all over HN. Can you give me examples, so I can tell them that they're wrong as well?