4 ms·

Why is this being modded down? It's the truth. Big companies almost always come out on top in trials because they can afford the best lawyers, and they can af

by Arizhel 10y ago

Why is this being modded down? It's the truth. Big companies almost always come out on top in trials because they can afford the best lawyers, and they can afford to game the system to bankrupt their opponents by filing never-ending motions to delay and other tactics which increase the legal costs to the opponent. You're almost never going to get a positive result if you're a rank-and-file employee; your best course of action is to leave the company and find something better.

rodgerd 10y ago
It's not just the best lawyers. Uber have already started contacting anyone who knows Susan Fowler, digging for dirt on her.
- sah2ed 10y ago
  How can you be so sure it was Uber? Susan's tweet was intentionally vague [0]. You are forgetting that some past and present employees that could be directly implicated by Susan's evidence may also choose the smear campaign route to save their hide. This could range from the women in HR* who might get thrown under the bus by Uber for aiding and abetting, to the men that perpetrated the actual harassment. *Of course this scenario playing out is highly unlikely given Uber's history. [0] https://twitter.com/susanthesquark/status/835193441814392833 https://twitter.com/susanthesquark/status/835193441814392833
  - intended 10y ago
    Isn't uber known for this? I remember them responding to a lawsuit or something by hiring PIs to get dirt on people - stuff beyond the merits of the case. They've always ended up looking
    - tedivm 10y ago
      Yes, they have threatened to dig up dirt on reporters and have even hired former CIA agents to go after information on someone who is suing them.
- rl3 10y ago
  >Uber have already started contacting anyone who knows Susan Fowler, digging for dirt on her. What a fantastic opportunity to send those assholes on a wild goose chase. Even better if they can somehow feed Uber bullshit that they later end up hanging themselves with.
  - Retric 10y ago
    That's risky, they don't need the truth they just need to be able to defend a liable suit.
- dpweb 10y ago
  Not judging cause the facts aren't fully known yet, but.. Doesn't matter. Court of law !== Court of public opinion. In fact, courts sometimes suspiciously follow the public mood. Seems there is some recent evidence, in sexual harassment matters: --Single accuser, no-one believes you --20 accusers, no one believes the accused The floodgates don't open until #1 goes public, and more follow.
rsp1984 10y ago
I personally know someone who went through this (related to IP, not sexual harassment). I understand the lawsuit dragged on for about seven years. He finally got awarded about eight million dollars in damages but hasn't been able to collect a single cent of it. When Peter Thiel says "single digit millionaires have no effective access to the legal system" [1] on the surface that sounds laughable and out-of-touch but I think there's a lot more truth to this than most people would like to admit. [1] http://www.businessinsider.de/peter-thiel-hulk-hogan-gawker-2016-10 http://www.businessinsider.de/peter-thiel-hulk-hogan-gawker-...
- ralfd 10y ago
  How does that work: He got awarded the money but can't collect it?
  - techdragon 10y ago
    Between appeals and that verdicts won't normally contain anything about how promptly payments must be made, things can drag on a while, then there's the simple honest stuff like, "the whole board must meet to approve expenditures over $X" and the settlement will be over that $X.
  - Arizhel 10y ago
    That's completely typical in the US court system. Winning a judgment is completely separate from actually collecting that judgment, and entails extra legal work to go after the assets of someone who refuses to pay the judgment.
DannyBee 10y ago
"Why is this being modded down? It's the truth. Big companies almost always come out on top in trials because they can afford the best lawyers, and they can afford to game the system to bankrupt their opponents by filing never-ending motions to delay and other tactics which increase the legal costs to the opponent. You're almost never going to get a positive result if you're a rank-and-file employee; your best course of action is to leave the company and find something better. " You claim this is the truth. On what do you base any of this, other than TV?
- roystonvassey 10y ago
  It probably is quite different in the States but in my country, this is very true. If you are a lone individual fighting a legal case against a large organization, chances are you will be worn down by years of litigation that often appears endless. To dissuade litigants even further, cases are filed in far-off remote outposts that make such endeavors cost-prohibitive even further [1, for e.g.]. [1] http://www.livemint.com/Specials/13TE2UEtexMf1GDeEt5rCP/Maheshwer-Peris-long-way-around.html http://www.livemint.com/Specials/13TE2UEtexMf1GDeEt5rCP/Mahe...
  - balladeer 10y ago
    Add on top of this how easy it is to buy law enforcements here (including judges). It's like a very fair and open market. Whoever pays more gets the favour. That's exactly how he got that order passed in a district court (which is not even a high court - apex court of a state, let alone the Supreme Court - nation's apex court) by a judge who probably heard the word Internet for the sixth time in his entire life and the term "webpage" I am sure for the first time and was paid well for issuing the order.
esterly 10y ago
Agreed. Are down modders anonymous? Seems unfair they can take 4x the points of a contributing comment.
M_Grey 10y ago
"Why is this being modded down? It's the truth." Since when has the truth been popular, or well received when it wasn't also what people wanted to hear?

by Arizhel 10y ago

rodgerd 10y ago

It's not just the best lawyers. Uber have already started contacting anyone who knows Susan Fowler, digging for dirt on her.

sah2ed 10y ago
How can you be so sure it was Uber? Susan's tweet was intentionally vague [0]. You are forgetting that some past and present employees that could be directly implicated by Susan's evidence may also choose the smear campaign route to save their hide. This could range from the women in HR* who might get thrown under the bus by Uber for aiding and abetting, to the men that perpetrated the actual harassment. *Of course this scenario playing out is highly unlikely given Uber's history. [0] https://twitter.com/susanthesquark/status/835193441814392833 https://twitter.com/susanthesquark/status/835193441814392833
- intended 10y ago
  Isn't uber known for this? I remember them responding to a lawsuit or something by hiring PIs to get dirt on people - stuff beyond the merits of the case. They've always ended up looking
  - tedivm 10y ago
    Yes, they have threatened to dig up dirt on reporters and have even hired former CIA agents to go after information on someone who is suing them.
rl3 10y ago
>Uber have already started contacting anyone who knows Susan Fowler, digging for dirt on her. What a fantastic opportunity to send those assholes on a wild goose chase. Even better if they can somehow feed Uber bullshit that they later end up hanging themselves with.
- Retric 10y ago
  That's risky, they don't need the truth they just need to be able to defend a liable suit.
dpweb 10y ago
Not judging cause the facts aren't fully known yet, but.. Doesn't matter. Court of law !== Court of public opinion. In fact, courts sometimes suspiciously follow the public mood. Seems there is some recent evidence, in sexual harassment matters: --Single accuser, no-one believes you --20 accusers, no one believes the accused The floodgates don't open until #1 goes public, and more follow.

rsp1984 10y ago

I personally know someone who went through this (related to IP, not sexual harassment). I understand the lawsuit dragged on for about seven years. He finally got awarded about eight million dollars in damages but hasn't been able to collect a single cent of it. When Peter Thiel says "single digit millionaires have no effective access to the legal system" [1] on the surface that sounds laughable and out-of-touch but I think there's a lot more truth to this than most people would like to admit. [1] http://www.businessinsider.de/peter-thiel-hulk-hogan-gawker-2016-10 http://www.businessinsider.de/peter-thiel-hulk-hogan-gawker-...

ralfd 10y ago
How does that work: He got awarded the money but can't collect it?
- techdragon 10y ago
  Between appeals and that verdicts won't normally contain anything about how promptly payments must be made, things can drag on a while, then there's the simple honest stuff like, "the whole board must meet to approve expenditures over $X" and the settlement will be over that $X.
- Arizhel 10y ago
  That's completely typical in the US court system. Winning a judgment is completely separate from actually collecting that judgment, and entails extra legal work to go after the assets of someone who refuses to pay the judgment.

DannyBee 10y ago

"Why is this being modded down? It's the truth. Big companies almost always come out on top in trials because they can afford the best lawyers, and they can afford to game the system to bankrupt their opponents by filing never-ending motions to delay and other tactics which increase the legal costs to the opponent. You're almost never going to get a positive result if you're a rank-and-file employee; your best course of action is to leave the company and find something better. " You claim this is the truth. On what do you base any of this, other than TV?

roystonvassey 10y ago
It probably is quite different in the States but in my country, this is very true. If you are a lone individual fighting a legal case against a large organization, chances are you will be worn down by years of litigation that often appears endless. To dissuade litigants even further, cases are filed in far-off remote outposts that make such endeavors cost-prohibitive even further [1, for e.g.]. [1] http://www.livemint.com/Specials/13TE2UEtexMf1GDeEt5rCP/Maheshwer-Peris-long-way-around.html http://www.livemint.com/Specials/13TE2UEtexMf1GDeEt5rCP/Mahe...
- balladeer 10y ago
  Add on top of this how easy it is to buy law enforcements here (including judges). It's like a very fair and open market. Whoever pays more gets the favour. That's exactly how he got that order passed in a district court (which is not even a high court - apex court of a state, let alone the Supreme Court - nation's apex court) by a judge who probably heard the word Internet for the sixth time in his entire life and the term "webpage" I am sure for the first time and was paid well for issuing the order.

esterly 10y ago

Agreed. Are down modders anonymous? Seems unfair they can take 4x the points of a contributing comment.

M_Grey 10y ago

"Why is this being modded down? It's the truth." Since when has the truth been popular, or well received when it wasn't also what people wanted to hear?